This adds a `make site` build target which builds the Jekyll site and runs a
local webserver to view it. Details in the commit messages.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3666
-- Commit Summary --
* Add Gemfil
dmnks left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3666)
I wonder about the `docs/manual/devel_documentation.md` file which, in a way,
duplicates the information in `docs/README.md`. I've only updated the latter
with the new build instructions for now. Any thoughts on what to do with the
former?
@nwalfield commented on this pull request.
> autosign=$(rpm --eval "%{?_openpgp_autosign_id}")
if [ -n "${autosign}" ]; then
log "Autosign already configured"
exit 0
fi
-genkey_sq
+# is there an explicit signing program config?
config*ured*
> +*rpm-setup-autosign* is used to set
See commits for details, but short summary: split autosigning setup from our
test-suite setup into a standalone script that generates a passwordless key,
configures rpmbuild to use it for autosigning, exports the pubkey and emits a
command to import it to rpm keystore.
I fully expect there to b
mlschroe left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3663)
I find the use case of trimming every line in the argument somewhat exotic.
Having said this, I think you can do that already with the current rpm version:
```
%multiline_trim() %{lua:return
(arg[1]:gsub('^%s',''):gsub("\\n%s*","\\n"):gsu
@pmatilai pushed 2 commits.
504fddb94812b9f108de2dd9150ce3568f88d38c Split autosigning setup to a
standalone script, generalize a bit
77f2a7ed207393c11d8f5947b5e64a93023d33fa Add support for setting up
auto-signing with gpg, tests and a man page
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-s
pmatilai left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3665)
(bitten by different prefixes there, again...)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3665#issuecomment-2733092452
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to th
@dmnks pushed 1 commit.
27501ce99d8e484c12a3bef093b50d37b62621f4 Add "make site" target for building
Jekyll site
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3666/files/90e3782deba9103dd3b4b2f853028634eab4cbe7..27501ce99d8e484c12a3bef093b50d37b62621f4
You are recei
@dmnks pushed 1 commit.
90e3782deba9103dd3b4b2f853028634eab4cbe7 Add "make site" target for building
Jekyll site
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3666/files/1c4a7315208da0ab89f9f010036c2cc095df8978..90e3782deba9103dd3b4b2f853028634eab4cbe7
You are recei
@dmnks pushed 1 commit.
1c4a7315208da0ab89f9f010036c2cc095df8978 Add "make site" target for building
Jekyll site
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3666/files/4fec4ea057b71816d29edc738edf23d915c9ab62..1c4a7315208da0ab89f9f010036c2cc095df8978
You are recei
lRespublica left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3663)
Yes, `\` was removed as a side effect of multi-line macros.
The example above demonstrates a situation where logical indentation is
necessary to improve readability, but %{expand:} cannot be used.
The primary function of %{trim: } is
pmatilai left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3664)
This is actually intentional. The debuginfo packages reported by rpmspec in
older versions doesn't match what is produced, which is buggy in its own right,
see #1878 and only a side-effect of the gross hack debuginfo's were
traditionall
dmnks left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#2854)
> On a related note, it wouldn't hurt to ship the manual in html format in our
> tarballs. I guess we'd need Mr Jekyll for that too.
This is probably no longer current as we're moving in the direction of
artifact-free tarballs now. That sa
fitzsim created an issue (rpm-software-management/rpm#3667)
When packaging a proprietary program, I encountered a library file that
contained both `RPATH` and `RUNPATH`.
`check-rpath-worker` reports this as an error as a side effect of not properly
handling the fact that there are two entries.
allhailwesttexas left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3664)
Thank you for the quick response @pmatilai, it's good to know that this is the
expected behaviour, I can work with that.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issue
15 matches
Mail list logo
