Nothing in rpm v6 depends on SHA-3 so this isn't timing critical for us,
it's more of a "HDTV-ready" type of thing :smile:
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3436#issuecomment-2464007538
You are receiving this because you
Merged #3433 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3433#event-15208158856
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
Yes, gpg-pubkeys do survive rpmdb --rebuild currently. But they don't get
reimported so they stay in the short id mode.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3347#issuecomment-2464573783
You are receiving this because you are
For the db, I guess you could basically create an empty rpmdb in an alternative
path where you put them temporarily.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3347#issuecomment-2464580389
You are receiving this because you are su
Hmm, the question is on how to do that in a save way. E.g. for the database
backend there is no clean slate to start from. We ofc could remove all
gpgpubkey packages and then add the loaded keys back. But that leaves things
very vulnerable inbetween.
The file based backends can at least save s
Oh, that. No idea.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3347#issuecomment-2464708417
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
Refactor code from the fs backend into shared helper functions
This does implement the layout on the file system and the write lock of the
openpgp.cert.d proposal according to
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nwjw-openpgp-cert-d-00.html but not the
Trust root, Petname mapping or Trusted int
Should have worded this better: Do the fs backend keys survive a rpmdb
--rebuild?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3347#issuecomment-2464689314
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message I
@nwalfield commented on this pull request.
>
-if (replace) {
- rasprintf(&tmppath, "%s.new", path);
- unlink(tmppath);
+rc = write_key_to_disk(key, dirstr, keyfmt, replace, flags);
+
+if (!rc && replace) {
+ /* find and delete the old pubkey entry */
I'm a bit co
@dmnks pushed 1 commit.
7627bd92182616ac0568c44dab4b1c00a559a56b fixup! Fixes + cleanups to rpmkeys
manual
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3433/files/6bec5fc3de53e8885a769c36b498e4b824e112df..7627bd92182616ac0568c44dab4b1c00a559a56b
You are receiving t
@dmnks approved this pull request.
LGTM, thanks Neal for looking, too! I've just fixed up a lonely opening square
bracket before the `--delete` argument (which is actually mandatory).
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/343
@dmnks pushed 1 commit.
42a192cde8b8d7bcb784a09520c9094f5325f2ca fixup! Fixes + cleanups to rpmkeys
manual
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3433/files/7627bd92182616ac0568c44dab4b1c00a559a56b..42a192cde8b8d7bcb784a09520c9094f5325f2ca
You are receiving t
@dmnks pushed 1 commit.
11794c9ab1b7379ecdc1c542fe6abbc68ad1a004 fixup! Sanitize rpmsign
--addsign/--delsign output
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3433/files/42a192cde8b8d7bcb784a09520c9094f5325f2ca..11794c9ab1b7379ecdc1c542fe6abbc68ad1a004
You are re
One more typo fixup :smile:
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3433#issuecomment-2464202384
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
I've autosquashed the fixup commit on top and will merge this once the CI
finishes. This is the fixup patch I've applied, just for full transparency:
```diff
diff --git a/docs/man/rpmkeys.8.md b/docs/man/rpmkeys.8.md
index e7993e52c..093a91606 100644
--- a/docs/man/rpmkeys.8.md
+++ b/docs/man/rp
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
>
-if (replace) {
- rasprintf(&tmppath, "%s.new", path);
- unlink(tmppath);
+rc = write_key_to_disk(key, dirstr, keyfmt, replace, flags);
+
+if (!rc && replace) {
+ /* find and delete the old pubkey entry */
The patch obscu
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> }
-if (rpmMkdirs(rpmtxnRootDir(txn), "%{_keyringpath}")) {
+free(dir);
+return rc;
+}
+
+/*/
+
+static rpmRC acquire_write_lock(rpmtxn txn)
The txn handle *
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> }
-if (rpmMkdirs(rpmtxnRootDir(txn), "%{_keyringpath}")) {
+free(dir);
+return rc;
+}
+
+/*/
+
+static rpmRC acquire_write_lock(rpmtxn txn)
I know. But the st
@nwalfield commented on this pull request.
>
-if (replace) {
- rasprintf(&tmppath, "%s.new", path);
- unlink(tmppath);
+rc = write_key_to_disk(key, dirstr, keyfmt, replace, flags);
+
+if (!rc && replace) {
+ /* find and delete the old pubkey entry */
Thanks for t
19 matches
Mail list logo
