Closed #3214 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3214#event-13842505490
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint m
This looks more like a regression in ima-evm-tools while deprecating the
sign_hash() function we use than anything in rpm, when the related code in rpm
hasn't changed at all. Issues should be investigated at least enough to confirm
them before moving upstream.
Closing this one, if I'm wrong we
IMA is actually used by distros now, we should cover it in our tests.
Testing the IMA plugin may be undoable in a container, but at least we should
test that signing works.
We can probably base on these, they're GPL v2.1:
https://github.com/RedHat-SP-Security/keylime-tests/blob/main/functional/in
Indeed, I'm just not sure if this is doable in containers. But maybe there's a
way (finding out will be part of this ticket).
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3237#issuecomment-2283276313
You are receiving this because yo
As the description says: we may not be able to the the plugin (ie
installation), but signing doesn't require any fancy kernel stuff.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3237#issuecomment-2283284617
You are receiving this bec
Ah, right. Time for a coffee here :smile:
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3237#issuecomment-2283300156
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: __
Relative _foodir for the build stuff was never supported by rpm, it just
happened to work in various cases in the past (see #3128, we're considering on
making it explicit). The new intermediate build directory in >= 4.20 just means
it happens to work for far fewer cases.
I tend to agree that th
It's related alright, but not the same.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3216#issuecomment-2283531109
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: _
> Relative _foodir for the build stuff was never supported by rpm, it just
> happened to work in various cases in the past (see
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3128, we're considering
> on making it explicit). The new intermediate build directory in >= 4.20 just
> means
@hroncok commented on this pull request.
> + execute({table} [, stdout [, stderr]])
+
+Execute an external command (rpm >= 4.20)
+This is an alternative form of rpm.execute() that takes the command and any
+arguments as a single Lua table.
+
+Standard output and/or error can be optionally re
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> + execute({table} [, stdout [, stderr]])
+
+Execute an external command (rpm >= 4.20)
+This is an alternative form of rpm.execute() that takes the command and any
+arguments as a single Lua table.
+
+Standard output and/or error can be optionally r
The status returned by waitpid() is not a simple integer, one needs the various
W* macros to examine it.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3238
-- Commit Summary --
* Fix rpm.execute() exit code reporting
--
Closed #3238.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3238#event-13848763825
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm
Read-only file systems fall into the same category as unsupported ones (i.e.
writing the desired file metadata to them is meaningless) so handle those
gracefully in the plugin hooks, too.
This is useful e.g. when preparing a system for IMA by reinstalling the desired
packages with the IMA plugi
Found by Coverity.
Fixes: RHEL-37564
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3240
-- Commit Summary --
* Fix memory leak in rpmsign
-- File Changes --
M tools/rpmsign.c (1)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.c
@hroncok commented on this pull request.
> + execute({table} [, stdout [, stderr]])
+
+Execute an external command (rpm >= 4.20)
+This is an alternative form of rpm.execute() that takes the command and any
+arguments as a single Lua table.
+
+Standard output and/or error can be optionally re
@hroncok commented on this pull request.
> + execute({table} [, stdout [, stderr]])
+
+Execute an external command (rpm >= 4.20)
+This is an alternative form of rpm.execute() that takes the command and any
+arguments as a single Lua table.
+
+Standard output and/or error can be optionally re
One scenario just came to mind:
1. You mount a directory (as read-only) over another directory that's owned by
an installed package
2. The plugin skips the directory silently
3. You unmount the directory
4. The original directory does not have the file attributes applied (!)
Maybe we should make
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> + execute({table} [, stdout [, stderr]])
+
+Execute an external command (rpm >= 4.20)
+This is an alternative form of rpm.execute() that takes the command and any
+arguments as a single Lua table.
+
+Standard output and/or error can be optionally r
Another leak that simply would not be there with a native C++ string...
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3240#issuecomment-2285444606
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Merged #3240 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3240#event-13858367288
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
These should probably be handled the same as fsm does (see commit
09d554da62ce84823849138a55a2ba0e72dd17f0): if there's an error applying, skip
if the attributes match, otherwise it's an error.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/
22 matches
Mail list logo
