Thanks @ffesti ! So I suppose this should be closed upstream, and I'll create a
bugzilla instead?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3073#issuecomment-2092433241
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thr
Ah, good point. This needs discussion on the Fedora side.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3073#issuecomment-2092549533
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
So this is similar to #3042 (and probably really just a more generic version of
that issue).
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3063#issuecomment-2092561549
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
I mean, it's not a full implementation because it only handles building,
signing and parsing packages (not rpmdb management or specfile parsing or
anything else), but, it kind of already exists
https://github.com/rpm-rs/rpm
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.c
Doesn't seem worth it to me
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2220#issuecomment-2094014697
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-m
