Closed #3068.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3068#event-12681683498
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm
Accidentally closed it, I will open a new PR.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3068#issuecomment-2090506199
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: _
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3072
-- Commit Summary --
* rpmpgppubkeyfingerprint.c: use const qualifier
* rpmpgppubkeyfingerprint.c: use rasprintf
* rpmpgppubkeyfingerprint.c: use goto for returning f
Created https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3072
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3068#issuecomment-2090760401
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: __
@pmatilai thanks for all the inputs. I have tried addressing all of them.
Please let me know if I have missed anything.
@ffesti thank you for reviewing my earlier PR.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3072#issuecomment-20907
@sshedi pushed 8 commits.
e2938095b9f376e58397acceb8d3c5185928c58c rpmpgppubkeyfingerprint.c: use
rpmGetCwd
3577dc5c43c912d613fff3ac9df21a41ca0c746c rpmpgppubkeyfingerprint.c: use static
buffer instead of malloc
a034d6c8d31caf1bf6b47ca3aa5d1d48f67341e2 rpmpgppubkeyfingerprint.c: move
variabl
I've taken a look at this MR, and it's basically churn. Some of the changes
are coding style, and some are opinionated, and some are weird, like having
`#define LEN 102400 // 100 * 1024`. If I have a vote, this is a nack from me.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://g
@nwalfield Thanks for reviewing.
> and some are weird, like having #define LEN 102400 // 100 * 1024
It would help me understand things better if you explain a bit on why it is
weird.
My intent behind the change is, why calculate something on every run which can
be used directly?
I'm completely
We are currently [trying to move our project to
systemd-sysusers](https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/20365), away
from manual `useradd` calls in the package's `%pre` script. The [rpm
manual](https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/users_and_groups.html)
claims
> Rpm
This helped a lot, but it's still applying the user creation and `%attr()`
processing in the wrong order. I filed issue #3073 about it.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2432#issuecomment-2092096531
You are receiving this be
A far as I know this feature is not enabled in Fedora 40. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19#Scope
rpm-4.18.92-disable-sysusers.patch
```
iff -up rpm-4.18.92/macros.in.orig rpm-4.18.92/macros.in
--- rpm-4.18.92/macros.in.orig 2023-08-02 17:56:49.858065935
11 matches
Mail list logo
