What about inconsistency between repo metadata and in RPMDB with package
checksums. Metadata contains file checksum (only one type), but RPMDB contains
a header checksum (multiple types). We have some users who wants to align
available packages with installed one and there is not enough informa
Is there any planned change related to changelogs?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2374#discussioncomment-5613128
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
__
Thank you for moving it to a proper place
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2374#discussioncomment-5613138
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Closed #2480.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2480#event-9005424815
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-
Rewriting the f-variants is a bit more work than I'm willing to spend on this.
I realized that I can simply install in two steps, first to install `setup`
which provides /etc/passwd and then to install the rest. For the second step, I
mount over passwd from the root over passwd from the host and
I don't see how rpm could help with repo metadata being non-extensible (despite
initial intentions - it's quite ironical that the supposedly extensible xml
became such an immovable obstacle).
As for changelogs, as you can see in this draft, no changes are planned.
--
Reply to this email direc
Well, RPM has the "fat" arch for multi-arch RPMs already...
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2374#discussioncomment-5613991
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
_
What's the background on the issue you are referring to here?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2374#discussioncomment-5616514
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
__
If I am not mistaken - changelogs are stored in rpm header and they are
uncompressed. Is there any reason to have them uncompressed?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2374#discussioncomment-5617027
You are receiving t
According to
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/dependency_generators.html
it is possible to define in .ttr files dependencies generators.
That works.
As long as .attr files defines macros I've been thinking that this will mean
that such macros meybe is possible to define dire
10 matches
Mail list logo
