Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM package invariants? (Discussion #2025)

v4 cannot require this because of backwards compatibility. v6 does require it. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2025#discussioncomment-5561362 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Messag

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM v6 package format, first public draft for commenting (Discussion #2374)

> except for the rpm magic, the lead will be zeros only I'm curious if we want to apply this even to the "major" file format version number in the lead? Of all the fields, that one seems like it could eventually have some potential use. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Don't rely on pkg-config for Lua (PR #2469)

Have we tried advocating to Lua upstream to include a pkgconfig file recently? If not, maybe that's worth doing, and then we can keep relying on pkgconfig. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2469#issuecomment-1501028061 You a