Instead of treating `%patch` with no options and errors the same as `%patch 0`,
just raise an error. There will be folks who have missed the warning-only
phase, but we don't want to wait another ten years to finally rid ourselves
of these legacy quirks.
Related: #2205
You can view, comment on,
Closed #2356 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2356#event-8362762267
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint ma
Okay, this seems to be fixed now really, closing.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2356#issuecomment-1404813687
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Merged #2367 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2367#event-8363097877
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint maili
The lead structure is obsolete for over 20 years, and except for the rpm file
magic, nothing must be relying on that (incomplete and insufficient) data being
there. The v6 format will be a nice opportunity to stop populating that data at
all, which means we get to drop all the arch number madnes
Yep, but *that* is far easier said than done. We've been laying the foundations
for that for a while now, see #2205 and various linked stuff.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1088#issuecomment-1404879688
You are receiving
So, the internal parser is deprecated and non-default in the cmake build, and
so the current target is achieved. Closing, removing will not be easy until we
gain some alternative C-language family based alternative.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-so
Closed #1935 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1935#event-8363225517
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint ma
The -,- syntax for user and group is a leftover from very, very old days before
BuildRoot: was even invented. Fast forward a decade where BuildRoot was made
mandatory, and that's 15 years ago already. Nobody should be running rpmbuild
as root, and we do NOT want to encourage that by any means wh
New macro ___build_package_notes_env contains environment variables that
package-notes depends on. This allows easier mocking of rpm build environment
and isolated execution of check phase of rpm packages possible.
Hi,
in many tests using upstream test suite is used approach that builds sources
very minor note: when updating these blocks, the comments haven't been updated.
This comment:
/* periods and plusses are escaped, splats become '.*' */
could read:
/* periods, plusses and carets are escaped, splats become '.*' */
and this one:
/* Copy pattern, escaping periods, pr
11 matches
Mail list logo
