You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2254
-- Commit Summary --
* tests: add test for parseForVerify
* tests: add test for Obsoletes
-- File Changes --
A tests/data/SPECS/test-obsoletes.spec (19)
A tes
Merged #2167 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2167#event-7720770044
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint maili
Translations update from [Fedora Weblate](https://translate.fedoraproject.org)
for [rpm/master](https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/rpm/master/).
Current translation status:
Yo
With Weblate managing our translations, carrying them does nothing but create
conflicts and annoyances of various kinds. Besides, the translation updates are
nothing but an annoyance in the git history. Translators deserve credit for
their work as much as anyone, but the code history is the wron
@pmatilai pushed 1 commit.
4292f3ca328273e198a999d30663426541227be0 Add rpm-l10n as a submodule into po/
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2256/files/f3d7f6dbea7283601c530a2110b57f3d9d645514..4292f3ca328273e198a999d30663426541227be0
You are receiving this
Merged #2256 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2256#event-7722821069
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint maili
Closed #2255.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2255#event-7722867458
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-
Ugh, Weblate was supposed to be locked during the operation but this one thing
got through...
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2255#issuecomment-1300291815
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Closed #2239 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2239#event-7722876382
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint ma
"Fixed" as of PR #2256 . There are further integration steps to be done, to be
tracked separately.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2239#issuecomment-1300293967
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this th
Okay, apparently nobody is that attached to these...
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2245#issuecomment-1300301233
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: __
Merged #2245 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2245#event-7722907903
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint maili
This maybe belongs more to rpm-l10n but we don't (want to) have issues on that
separately, so filing here.
We need to setup translatable string extraction someplace to feed into rpm-l10n
feeding into Weblate, perhaps GitHub action as anaconda uses which would make
the whole thing very hands-off
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ At the end of invocation of a parameterized macro, the
> above macros are
Within the body of a macro, there are several constructs that permit
testing for the presence of optional parameters. The simplest construct
-is "%{-f}"
@ferdnyc commented on this pull request.
> @@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ At the end of invocation of a parameterized macro, the
> above macros are
Within the body of a macro, there are several constructs that permit
testing for the presence of optional parameters. The simplest construct
-is "%{-f}" w
@ferdnyc commented on this pull request.
> @@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ At the end of invocation of a parameterized macro, the
> above macros are
Within the body of a macro, there are several constructs that permit
testing for the presence of optional parameters. The simplest construct
-is "%{-f}" w
@ferdnyc commented on this pull request.
> +`%{?!macro_name:value}` is the negative variant. It is expanded to "value"
+if "macro_name" not is defined. Otherwise it is expanded to the empty string.
Here, by the same logic, "value" wouldn't be fenced -- but `macro_name`
probably should be. (Als
@ferdnyc pushed 1 commit.
67a0fa39919fca7875d672d5cd2b131370724433 Docs: macros: Add some missing
fencing, fix grammar
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2251/files/865fe590f0335a804f177f04236f77bcd7eecc20..67a0fa39919fca7875d672d5cd2b131370724433
You are
@ferdnyc commented on this pull request.
> @@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ At the end of invocation of a parameterized macro, the
> above macros are
Within the body of a macro, there are several constructs that permit
testing for the presence of optional parameters. The simplest construct
-is "%{-f}" w
While investigating [this
issue](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm-sequoia/issues/20), I
tried to build `rpm` as follows:
```
$ cmake -DENABLE_PYTHON=OFF ..
...
-- Checking for module 'lua'
-- Found lua, version 5.4.2
...
-- Configuring done
-- Generating done
-- Build files have
@ferdnyc commented on this pull request.
> +…where `` is a legal macro name and `` is the body of the macro.
+Multiline macros can be defined by shell-like line continuation, ie ``\``
^ Another option would be to have GitHub Actions regenerate the website
automatically on every push to the `ma
@ferdnyc commented on this pull request.
> +…where `` is a legal macro name and `` is the body of the macro.
+Multiline macros can be defined by shell-like line continuation, ie ``\``
(I'm assuming the site is pre-rendered to static HTML. If rpm.org runs directly
off the `.md` files and render
> On a related note, we should have docs/README explaining how to test-render
> locally for rpm.org...
_Originally posted by @pmatilai in
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2251#discussion_r1010414825_
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://gith
I responded:
^ Another option would be to have GitHub Actions regenerate the website
automatically on every push to the master branch. (Or, every push that touches
the docs/ subdir. GitHub Actions' job triggers are capable of that level of
precision.)
The Action could either export the generat
@ferdnyc commented on this pull request.
> +…where `` is a legal macro name and `` is the body of the macro.
+Multiline macros can be defined by shell-like line continuation, ie ``\``
I've created #2259 for the above.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rp
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ At the end of invocation of a parameterized macro, the
> above macros are
Within the body of a macro, there are several constructs that permit
testing for the presence of optional parameters. The simplest construct
-is "%{-f}"
Thanks for the fixes!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2251#issuecomment-1301697535
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-maint mai
Merged #2251 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2251#event-7729247667
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint maili
28 matches
Mail list logo
