@JetXujing pushed 1 commit.
9b55215c72a5e6209d530d9bf237c0c5e015febc fix *sbp leak when running rpmbuild
with --quiet
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2293/files/3986afaef7859503da09f942cfcb89d775fb8307..9b55215c72a5e6209d530d9bf237c0c5e015febc
You are
@JetXujing pushed 1 commit.
5a8297fbc57cf74537e0821e58560434ea1e43ad fix *sbp leak when running rpmbuild
with --quiet
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2293/files/d7a90cad20c6a651c36f4201079124067b04d6b9..5a8297fbc57cf74537e0821e58560434ea1e43ad
You are
Yeah, I submitted builds for rpm-sequoia to stable branches as well to make
testing / CI easier. :) Hope it helps.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2065#issuecomment-1327728276
You are receiving this because you are subsc
Fixes: #1294
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2297
-- Commit Summary --
* Glob special files only once, internally
* Refactor processSpecialDir()
-- File Changes --
M build/files.c (68)
M tests/dat
Hi,
``PANDOC`` is required to build manual and It shall be checked.
This PR is to check ``PANDOC`` in ```CMakeList.txt```.
Could U help to review it? Thanks
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2296
-- C
Interesting case, thanks for reporting and the reproducer!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2273#issuecomment-1327472411
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: __
Seems decathorpe made rpm-sequoia available even on F36, but as F37 was
recently released I just updated our CI to that in #2295. rpm-sequoia 1.2.0 was
submitted to F37 stable updates a moment ago and I've verified that the
test-suite passes with that, so we should be able to swap to this next w
Merged #2295 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2295#event-7892537353
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint maili
After being stuck on an EOL Fedora for so long, it's nice to be on the
leading edge for a change.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2295
-- Commit Summary --
* Bump CI to Fedora 37
-- File Changes --
M c
> > "emsg" is leaked in some cases when running rpmbuild, because "emsg"
> > may be alloced and be set when checkDep returns RPMRC_OK.
>
> If emsg is allocated when checkDep() returns without an error, then perhaps
> _that_ should be fixed instead I think. What's the case where that happens, I
>
At least the following:
```
/home/pmatilai/repos/rpm/rpmio/digest_openssl.c: In function
‘constructRSASigningKey’:
/home/pmatilai/repos/rpm/rpmio/digest_openssl.c:197:5: error: ‘RSA_new’ is
deprecated: Since OpenSSL 3.0 [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
197 | RSA *rsa = RSA_new();
|
> "emsg" is leaked in some cases when running rpmbuild, because "emsg"
may be alloced and be set when checkDep returns RPMRC_OK.
If emsg is allocated when checkDep() returns without an error, then *that*
should be fixed instead I think. What's the case where that happens, I didn't
see anything i
Could not quite bring myself to just say no.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2249#issuecomment-1327216695
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: __
Merged #2249 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2249#event-7891355010
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint maili
Merged #2292 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2292#event-7891320781
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint maili
Closed #2288 as completed via #2292.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2288#event-7891320894
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rp
fix some resource leaks in some cases when running rpmbuild or rpm2cpio.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2293
-- Commit Summary --
* fix BANames leak in handlePreambleTag
* fix emsg leak in parseRCPOT
* f
Oops. Too many edits syndrome, thanks for spotting.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/55d9f24e6b02d72f2358a5d7cb7ca16127ae7fb7#r91037975
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
__
is set up*.* *Y*ou
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/55d9f24e6b02d72f2358a5d7cb7ca16127ae7fb7#r91037856
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
__
executing
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/55d9f24e6b02d72f2358a5d7cb7ca16127ae7fb7#r91037824
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
@pmatilai pushed 1 commit.
55d9f24e6b02d72f2358a5d7cb7ca16127ae7fb7 Also make the ci target a boolean
option with explicit dependencies
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2292/files/821bd6c271d99b37391398ce8577da5c29f9ec9c..55d9f24e6b02d72f2358a5d7cb7ca16
Silently skipping the "check" target generation if one or more of its
dependencies are missing is unobvious and inconsistent with how other optional
dependencies are handled. Add an option to disable the tests-suite and make
it's dependencies explicit.
Fixes: #2288
You can view, comment on, or
Closed #2291.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2291#event-7890900132
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-
Hmm, on a second thought, a better way to handle this is to just make the
test-suite a cmake option, just like our other optional bits with extra
dependencies.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2291#issuecomment-1327153787
fakechroot is not required for generating the tests, only for executing them.
Thus it makes more sense to test for it at "make check" time.
Don't bother with find_program() here, the testsuite isn't using that
anyway, it simply assumes a command called "fakechroot" exists in the
users path and
25 matches
Mail list logo
