This is a feature. The way the spec parser works, rpm will never see the Patch
line at all, just like `#if 0` prevents a compiler from looking at what's
inside.
Proper packaging requires that patch and source declarations are unconditional,
if conditionals are needed those need to be used when
Closed #2282 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2282#event-7864741175
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint ma
The spec file may contain the following information:
if "xxx" is not defined, the aaa.patch will not be packed into src.rpm. When I
download the src.rpm and build in an environment wher
> This doesn't actually address #2208. It only enables the omission of `-`, and
> that only works if you also supply another argument (`-n` in the above
> examples), otherwise rpm2archive fails. Also, a man page update would be in
> order if we change such behavior.
>
> What we need is to _alwa
I'm all for making this tool consistent with rpm2cpio (or even replacing the
latter as suggested), but how do we handle the current use case of getting a
file written to the current directory? Do we care at all?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-softwa
This doesn't actually address #2208. It only enables the omission of `-`, and
that only works if you also supply another argument (`-n` in the above
examples), otherwise rpm2archive fails. Also, a man page update would be in
order if we change such behavior.
What we need is to *always* print to
Closed #2244.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2244#event-7858093859
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-
Okay this has fallen through the cracks for so long it's damn embarrassing to
begin a review at this point. Sorry about that.
Prefix the newly introduced cli-switches and macro names with verity_ or
something, to make it clear these are only related to that whereas PKCS#11
could be relevant for
This PR appears to just have had its first anniversary :laughing:
Did you ever work up the Lua-native version further, or did you just run out of
time/inspiration?
The original case was also pretty much forgotten by me at least, so for
reference this originates from ticket #1825
--
Reply to t
