Merged #2271 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2271#event-7830497915
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint maili
Good, one more regression that cannot happen again. Thanks, both of you.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2271#issuecomment-1318123326
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: __
Added test case and mered the first two patches.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2271#issuecomment-1317320343
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: __
Thank you for your reply, based on the
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/739 discussion, it doesn't
seem necessary to revise it.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2253#issuecomment-1316867537
You are rec
Closed #1222 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1222#event-7822627177
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint ma
This was implemented in #1485
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1222#issuecomment-1316800172
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm
Closed #2254.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2254#event-7822593007
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-
I further tweaked this and merged manually:
- noticed missing --nouser --nogroup on the verify test, which doesn't get
spotted on the CI
- merged the obsolete test into the group of other obsoletes
Thanks for the tests!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rp
> Yeah, sounds like a separate issue to me, if at all. We might as well declare
> that the prep stage is the first one that cares about BuildRequires so if you
> skip it, then they won't be checked. Maybe it would deserve a mention in the
> man page?
... of course, it still *is* technically a r
> There is an argument to be made that the BuildDependency check should also be
> made when --short-circuit is given (which it is currently not (except for
> prep after this patch or `-bf` before) but may be this is a separate issue.
Yeah, sounds like a separate issue to me, if at all. We might
The code looks simple enough, but this could use a test-case to prevent future
regressions.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2271#issuecomment-1316758145
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Me
11 matches
Mail list logo
