I feel that checkCIF (and by extension, CCDC) is growing increasingly
hostile to us crystallographic bottom-feeders who ply our trade with powder
diffraction data. I'm sure that members of this group share my frustration
in getting inappropriate complaints like a missing Flack parameter,
_diffrn_m
I join!
Miguel Gregorkiewitz
PS so far, i had no problems to have accepted my validations, but checkcif
is a questionable hurdle in powder diffraction!
El sáb, 7 oct. 2023 2:04, Peter Stephens
escribió:
> I feel that checkCIF (and by extension, CCDC) is growing increasingly
> hostile to us cry
