I try and avoid this, but as the scenario Leo describes is identical to those
that I deal with, I'll self-cite. Whitfield et al, Solid State Ionics, v175
(2005), 463-471 describes a relatively simple (R-3m) application using lab,
neutron, off-edge and resonant patterns simultaneously. A paper
Dear all,
Isnt it much more natural to publish only atomic coordinates in a direct
space without inversion ?
Therefore I propose, that publishing data in other units should be
avoided.
Sounds very tough.
Best regards,
--
Olga Smirnova
Laboratoire de Cristallographie
24, quai Ernest-Ansermet
C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I am using FULLPROF 2006 for the analysis of my system. I am having one
problem in defining the constraint. Actually I have 4 cations in my system
and want to put a constraint as w+x+y+z=1. Is it possible to define such
constraints using FULLPROF.
In principle i
--- Olga Smirnova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isnt it much more natural to publish only atomic
> coordinates in a direct space without inversion ?
Publishing only the end result hides any errors that
might have been made during the analysis: the reader
of the paper should at least be able to see
