Dear All,
if I well understood JFC correction is perfect in case of
parallel incident beam; so, in case of conventional
Bragg-Brentano diffractometer, shouldn't it work well only
in case of use of Goebel Mirrors, that get incident beam
exactly parallel?
And is it true that using Goebel Mirrors and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
if I well understood JFC correction is perfect in case of
parallel incident beam; so, in case of conventional
Bragg-Brentano diffractometer, shouldn't it work well only
in case of use of Goebel Mirrors, that get incident beam
exactly parallel?
And is it true tha
Dear Larry,
When you removed the soller slits leading to increased the axial divergence, which profile function is appropriate to model this, especially at low angle where the asymmetry is very stark?
Kind regards
William
On 30 May 2006, at 16:01, Larry Finger wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dea
Dear all
Does anybody could tell me how GSAS can extract intensity and hkl valuesneeded
by SHELXTL-97 software for structure determination ?
Any suggestions or comments are welcome. Thanks in advance.
Best wishes
Dr. Y. P. Tong
China
Will Bisson wrote:
Dear Larry,
When you removed the soller slits leading to increased the axial
divergence, which profile function is appropriate to model this,
especially at low angle where the asymmetry is very stark?
I used GSAS profile type 3, which incorporates the Finger, Cox and
Jephco
Use "R" option in REFLIST
R.B. Von Dreele
IPNS Division
Argonne National Laboratory
Argonne, IL 60439-4814
-Original Message-
From: Dr. Yi-Ping Tong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 9:55 AM
To: Rietveld BBS
software?
Dear all
Does anybody could tell me how GSAS
AlanCoelho wrote:
I would like to conclude that to be critical of a method such as the
convolution approach to describing instrument line profiles it would serve
authors best to first investigate the approach rather than to be critical of
it without substance.
Amen!
I'm really impressed with
How about even lower angles?
From: Larry Finger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 5/30/2006 4:25 PM
To: rietveld_l@ill.fr
AlanCoelho wrote:
> I would like to conclude that to be critical of a method such as the
> convolution approach to describing instrument
