the refinement.
Otherwise we run into another problem when
changes in atomic coordinates do not move atom to different site.
Peter Zavalij
From: Brian Toby
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 11:20
AM
To: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: mismatch between ICSD
cif
On May 17, 2005, at 12:31 AM, Donald Wang wrote:
After 1/8 offset, it appears that the pattern from live plot is a good match to ICSD-generated pattern, which basically solved my problem. I am very happy and grateful.
There is still a little problem. The multiplicity column did not change at al
To: rietveld_l@ill.frSubject: RE: mismatch between ICSD cif
file and GSAS
Don,
As Allen
Larson noted GSAS only uses the 2nd setting for space groups that have two
(e.g. F d 3 m) so that he inversion center is placed at the origin. The eta
alumina structure you have is for t
31 PM
To: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: mismatch between ICSD cif
file and GSAS
Dear all,
I have a puzzle here. I have been learning GSAS for a while
but still at a relatively low level.
I am trying to calculate % of glass phase in a plasma sprayed alumina
coating (eta alumina, ISCD #39104, spa
PMTo: rietveld_l@ill.frSubject: mismatch between ICSD
cif file and GSAS
Dear
all,
I have a puzzle here. I have been learning GSAS for a while
but still at a relatively low level.
I am trying to calculate % of glass phase in a plasma sprayed alumina
coating (eta alumina,
Donald Wang wrote:
Dear all,
I have a puzzle here. I have been learning GSAS for a while but still
at a relatively low level. I am trying to calculate % of glass phase in
a plasma sprayed alumina coating (eta alumina, ISCD #39104, space group
Fd-3M, 227). The structure is copy-pasted as be
Dear all,
I have a puzzle here.
I have been learning GSAS for a while but still at a relatively low level. I am trying to calculate % of glass
phase in a plasma sprayed alumina coating (eta
alumina, ISCD #39104, space group Fd-3M, 227). The structure is copy-pasted as below:
A
