- Original Message -
From: "Peter Y. Zavalij"
Date: Friday, January 9, 2009 7:17 pm
Subject: RE: error in peak positions that is linear in theta
> Kurt,
>
> It looks like incorrect step size (difference between actual step
> size and
> one that is written in the file) or
inenweber [mailto:ku...@asu.edu]
> > *Sent:* Thursday, January 08, 2009 6:09 PM
> > *To:* Rietveld_l@ill.fr
> > *Subject:* error in peak positions that is linear in theta
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Rietvelders,
> >
> >
> >
> > (I hope this
: (301)314-9121
*From:* Kurt Leinenweber [mailto:ku...@asu.edu]
*Sent:* Thursday, January 08, 2009 6:09 PM
*To:* Rietveld_l@ill.fr
*Subject:* error in peak positions that is linear in theta
Dear Rietvelders,
(I hope this list is appropriate for this question). I am trying to set
up a new D8
Zavalij
X-ray Crystallographic Center
University of Maryland
College Park, MD
Office: (301)405-1861
Lab: (301)405-3230
Fax: (301)314-9121
From: Kurt Leinenweber [mailto:ku...@asu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 6:09 PM
To: Rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: error in peak positions that is
Dear Kurt,
It seems that the problem is in wrong sample-to-detector distance which results
in the nearly linear angular dependence of the peak displacement.
Regards,
Leonid
*
Leonid A. Solovyov
Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technol
Dear Rietvelders,
(I hope this list is appropriate for this question). I am trying to set
up a new D8 diffractometer from Bruker, and have it set up with a Vario
monochromator focusing on a sample in a capillary. Of course I hope to
do Rietveld refinement on the samples eventually. But there
