Howdy everyone,
Concerning the data storage formats, Brian Toby wrote that (some time ago)
am not sure that I would use CIF as my internal format, if I were to
create a database, since it is not designed for searching, but I would
certainly want the ability to bot
Lubomir Smrcok wrote:
> It would be nice if you make public the subroutines you have
> mentioned in your mail.
Sorry, no intent to be obscure, just brief. See
http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/cif/index.html (in the Americas,
http://www.us.iucr.org/iucr-top/cif/index.html) and look for CIFtbx2
(and C
Brian,
there is no reason to call your work "a thankless task". We all (I mean
powder diffractionist) owe you a lot for your effort to make our life
easier. It would be nice if you make public the subroutines you have
mentioned in your mail. THough I agree with you that for many of us it is
easier
Hello everyone,
I came in this morning to find quite a bit of discussion concerning CIF
in my inbox, particularly since many of you chose to cc me as well as
post to the discussion list.
I am the principle (unprincipled?) author of the powder
diffraction-specific part of CIF, known as pdCIF and
