Seems like that figure is out of content! In phase transformation and
a high time resolution studies you will come across something like
that.
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Matthew Rowles wrote:
> Hi Kurt
>
> Maybe the paper by Bridget Ingham would be of interest: Statistical measures
> of spot
Hi Kurt
Maybe the paper by Bridget Ingham would be of interest: Statistical
measures of spotiness in diffraction rings.
Just an idea.
Matthew
Hi all,
In my defense, 10 of the 12 messages relating to this topic have had their
footers attached. I will try to figure out how to get rid of it for n
I agree with Bill.Also, I haven't done any practical Rietveld refinement for years but, aside from the aforementioned snarkiness, still enjoy reading the discussions. In my current day job, I am also involved in supplying (admittedly a very small amount of) equipment to neutron and synchrotron
Dear Kurt,
You can peaksearch the images with any number of packages and then look
at the extracted spot positions. The stuff we wrote lives at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fable/ and it is normally used to fit
grain-by-grain strain tensors. If you can isolate the spots you do
indeed get a l
P.S. When the splitting arises from a phase transition, sometimes we see what
we call "snowmen" or pairs of spots that are split between the two rings. I
interpret these as twins arising from the phase transition. Has anyone seen
these types of pairs of spots before? I think there is a lot o
Hi all,
In my defense, 10 of the 12 messages relating to this topic have had their
footers attached. I will try to figure out how to get rid of it for next time.
Here is a topic I am interested in: we are collecting a lot of data on an
imaging plate (GSECARS and HPCAT at Advanced Photon Source
I only get to read these mails as a humble operator of the IUCr website,
but I really enjoy the discussions - please don't stop them!
Robert Gould
Tel.UK: +44 (0)131 667 7230 or +44 (0)796 040 3872
Canada: +1 519 387 8223
On 08/05/2015 17:06, Alan Hewat wrote:
I apologize in advance for a
hear hear! I second Larry's motion of practice what you preach :)
Personally, I read and follow all posts and find this message board
entertaining if nothing else.
But to discuss the original topic of this thread, the diffractograms look like
they were hand drawn. Not to contribute to the ridi
Hi~,
Although I am out of the track to do chemistry for now, I am still happy to
be in the list to feel a chemist.
And the patterns are same for me with just small bit of Zero shift. I am
curious what they made out of it.
CJ
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Leopoldo Suescun
wrote:
> Dear colle
On 05/08/2015 11:16 AM, Kurt Leinenweber wrote:
Hi Alan,
I still like the Rietveld list and do read all the posts.
Is it possible to block attachments so that people can’t attach files any more?
-Kurt
Thus writes the guy whose mailer blindly attaches a message footer rather than
in-lining a
As a to-be postdoc, I'm really grateful for the existence of this list and
so many kind experts involved in the discussion. Simply put, my PhD thesis
can not be finished without this list. I still read the posts. Thank you so
much Alan for maintaining such a nice community.
Enyuan
On Fri, May 8,
what's going on, Alan? Are you getting older and disappointed through
attachments and other misachievements of life? I really don't hope so,
because, for me, I eagerly follow the rietveld list and I think that
many more people actually does so!
chears
Miguel
---
michele gregorkiewitz
Dip Sc
I too enjoy reading the discussions that emerge every now and then in this
group, and I hope to see more of them in the future. Speaking of that, could
you change my e-mail to arto.oj...@gmail.com? My employment ended and with it,
the mail account will be gone soon as well.
Regards,
Arto
_
My personal observation only of course – I’ve seen that a lot of “entry level”
questions are met with incredibly snarky comments which I find very
off-putting. The participants on this site should welcome all questions – it’s
an opportunity to teach, not ridicule.
Bill Reese
From: alan.he...
I also agree that it serves a purpose, even though it is much quieter compared
to when i first joined many years ago. I would not want to see it closed down,
as there are questions coming up from time to time that would be very hard to
get answered anywhere else.
As Kurt suggests – why not just
Hi Alan,
I still like the Rietveld list and do read all the posts.
Is it possible to block attachments so that people can’t attach files any more?
- Kurt
From: alan.he...@gmail.com [mailto:alan.he...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alan Hewat
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 9:07 AM
To: Leopoldo Su
>
> I apologize in advance for attaching a file but I cannot share my
> astonishment without it.
> that´s why I worry more and more every day.
>
And I worry that people are still attaching files to the whole list when
they are explicitly asked not too. Most papers are on-line now, so just
give
Dear colleagues,
I apologize in advance for attaching a file but I cannot share my
astonishment without it.
With so many advanced pieces of equipment for powder diffraction data
collection spread all over the world and so many nice pieces of software
written to handle (and interpret) powder diffra
18 matches
Mail list logo
