Dear all,
Recently I am doing the full profile neutron refinement of an dual phase
steel with GSAS software. After I entered a specific temperature, for example,
640C, the software automatically produced a group of default data. When I
finished other parameter refinement, I noticed that the U
Dear Congwu,
as you put it, it definitely seems that you don't get out the MoK
radiation from your collimator. Control the alignment and make sure
the beam hits your sample.
best
miguel
On 25 Jan 2007 at 9:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, Miguel, the unit is the so-called moment transfer
... The problems bothering me are
the measured peak is much wider than the simulation
Peak widths should be 400 microns (your beamsize) divided by 3.5 cm
(your distance) in radians, which is about 180*0.4/3.5/PI = 6.5 degrees.
HTH,
Jon
Hi, Miguel, the unit is the so-called moment transfer that is calculated as
sin(theta)/lambda. When I did the simulation, I use the Zr K-emission as the
first wavelength and the Mo-K-alpha as the second, because the spectrum I
measured with an AMTREK spectrometer shows that the Zr line is higher th
Congwu,
I'm getting confused with the units of your diffraction patterns, could
you just indicate 2theta which is probably the primary observation
without any assumption about lambda?
Also, I've trouble with your simulated Si pattern: there should be no
traces of Zr radiation generated peaks,
