Hi,
I'm trying to use poolboy to organize a pool of connections to riak
nodes with protobuf client.
This has come from the suggestion here:
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2012-September/009346.html
The quote:
"Using Poolboy is convenient because it comes as a depende
ributed between the machines.
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Yuri Lukyanov wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to use poolboy to organize a pool of connections to riak
>> nodes with protobuf client.
>>
>> This has come from the suggestion h
Hi,
I have a cluster with old 0.13.0 riak nodes installed. Erlang native API
client is used to get/put data to/from the cluster.
Now I'm trying to start using protobuf client (riakc_pb_socket). The
problem is that the pb client can't read data saved with old native
riak_client.
Steps to reproduce:
I suggest that you use http://www.couchbase.com/ (ex-membase) instead
as a cache layer. It's faster but less reliable than riak, which is ok
for cache layer.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Pavel Kogan wrote:
> Hi all experts,
>
> I want to use Riak for caching and have few questions:
>
> 1) Ho
Hi,
I was adding the 7-th node to one of our riak 1.2 clusters. Everything was
ok untill the process suddenly stopped with one handoff left:
# riak-admin transfers
Attempting to restart script through sudo -H -u riak
riak@nsto0r6 waiting to handoff 1 partitions
Active Transfers:
Note that no t
riak-admin ringready ?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
>
> --Alex
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Alexander Moore wrote:
>
>> Hi Yuri,
>>
>> What backend are you using?
>>
>> What does riak-admin ring-status output?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
Hi,
To begin with, I almost fucked up production servers with these
changes in riak_pb:
https://github.com/basho/riak_pb/commit/2505ff1fa3975b93150d7445b6f7b91940ecb970
Well, this issue boils down to commonly known rebar-related problem. I
was even hesitating which mailing list I should've sent t
Glad to hear you are moving away from master dependencies. Would be
great if all of us follow this way. It's sad that even if you
completely sorted out your own deps and rebar.conig's, it does not
solve the problem in general. You may still want to use third-party
deps which are not necessary good
Hi,
I have a cluster of 17 riak (1.2.1) nodes with bitcask as a backend.
Recetly one of the node was down for a while. After the node had been
started the cluster started doing handoffs as expected. But then a merge
process also began on the same node. I know this from the log messages like
this:
still have concerns about
this. Even if one node is merging at the moment, it looks like the whole
cluster is significantly affected.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Yuri Lukyanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a cluster of 17 riak (1.2.1) nodes with bitcask as a backend.
>
> Recetly one
10 matches
Mail list logo