Hello,
I have a problem with persistent timeouts during ownership handoffs. I've
tried to surf over Internet and current mail list but no success.
I have Riak 1.4.12 cluster with 17 nodes. Almost all nodes use multibackend
with bitcask and eleveldb as storage backends (we need multiple backend fo
#x27;re transferring data from bitcask
> and leveldb. The next place I would look is in the leveldb LOG files to
> see if there are any leveldb vnodes that are having problems that's
> preventing repair.
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:15 AM Vladyslav Zakhozhai <
least
temoprarily).
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:19 PM Vladyslav Zakhozhai <
v.zakhoz...@smartweb.com.ua> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Average size of objects in Riak - 300 Kb. This objects are images. This
> data updates very very rearly (there almost no updates).
>
> I have GC turne
--- handoff ip address configured in
> app.config
>
> "127.0.0.1",< hostname passed to socket open
>
> {ok,{hostent,"127.0.0.1",[],inet,4,[{127,0,0,1}]}}, <--- DNS entry for
> hostname
>
> 10019}],<--
ersion 2.0.9 is not present
> in any shipping version of Riak … yet).
>
> I will write again if I can think of an easier solution. But nothing is
> occurring to me or the team members I have queried.
>
> Matthew
>
> On Oct 29, 2015, at 12:14 PM, Vladyslav Zakhozhai <
>
Hi,
Matthew thank you for information.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:19 PM Matthew Von-Maszewski
wrote:
> I queried Basho’s Client Services team. They tell me the upgrade /
> coexist should be no problem.
>
> Matthew
>
> On Oct 29, 2015, at 1:38 PM, Vladyslav Zakh
Hello.
I have Riak CS cluster with 18 nodes. On each node there is Riak CS and
Riak service and one Stanchion node.
Versions:
Riak 1.4.12
Riak CS 1.5.0
Stanchion 1.5.0
Riak CS and Riak allocated behind HAProxy balancers:
WAN -> HAProxy -> Riak CS nodes -> HAProxy -> Riak nodes.
ans
Stanchion ->
8.5
> [2]: https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#8.2.2
> [3]:
> http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/cookbooks/Riak-CS-Release-Notes/#Riak-CS-1-5-2
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Vladyslav Zakhozhai
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
>
Hi,
According to the following link there is a bug in 2.1.0 which may cause
data loss:
https://docs.basho.com/riak/2.0.5/community/product-advisories/210-dataloss/
I've installed 2.1.1 riak deb package from basho's repository on
packagecloud. But from riak stats I see that there is riak_core_vers
Hi.
I have a trouble with PUT to Riak CS cluster. During this process I
periodically see the following message in Riak error.log:
2016-06-03 11:15:55.201 [error]
<0.15536.142>@riak_kv_vnode:encode_and_put:2253 Put failure: too many
siblings for object OBJECT_NAME (101)
and also
2016-06-03 12:41
doff
> completes.
>
> Please see the documentation for the transfer-limit command as well:
>
> http://docs.basho.com/riak/kv/2.1.4/using/admin/riak-admin/#transfer-limit
>
> --
> Luke Bakken
> Engineer
> lbak...@basho.com
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:55 AM, Vladysl
Hello,
I thought that I know the meaning of command riak-admin down NODE pretty
sure. Till this evening.
So the question is what is explicit meaning of this command?
My opinion was the following. During ownership handoff (maybe hinted
handoffs also, I am not sure) when one of the members of riak
457491}},
{'riak@mussurana.pleiad.uaprom
',{1,63611332446}},
{'riak@yarara.pleiad.uaprom
',{1,63611164933}}]},
boa, boiga and cascavel - this new nodes that was not joined to cluster.
chameleon and chuckw
log is about 30
minutes. And I want to point your attention that I've forbid PUT method on
haproxy - frontend for riak cs.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:17 AM Vladyslav Zakhozhai <
v.zakhoz...@smartweb.com.ua> wrote:
> Hi, Luke.
>
> Thank you for your answer. I did not understand
ls_version" : "1.6.11",
"goldrush_version" : "0.1.7",
"ibrowse_version" : "4.0.2",
"mochiweb_version" : "2.9.0",
"exometer_core_version" : "1.0.0-basho2-0-gb47a5d6",
"ssl_version" : "5.3.1
Hi,
I'm wondering about pbc_pool_master_workers Riak CS Stats metric. I want to
clear its meaning for myself.
Is this metric means free pbc (to riak) connections in the pool or it
indicates count of pbc connections established to riak without
consideration of its usage and state (I mean is it che
se there is only one riak client
- Riak CS and it does not manage bucket types of PUT'ed object (so, default
bucket type always is used during PUT's). Is it correct?
Thank you in advance.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:45 AM Vladyslav Zakhozhai <
v.zakhoz...@smartweb.com.ua> wrote:
>
iak_kv/issues/1188 suggests
> that adding the property `riak_kv.retry_put_coordinator_failure=false` may
> help in future. But won’t help with your keys with too many siblings.
>
> On 24 May 2017, at 09:22, Russell Brown wrote:
>
> >
> > On 24 May 2017, at 09:11,
I can't
change default_bucket_props simultaneously in a such way.
I also can change this parameter in riak console, i.e.
application:set_env(riak_core, default_bucket_props, [{dvv_enabled, true},
..]). But what I need to do for applying this changes?
On Wed, May 24, 2017 a
Hi Magnus,
Thank you for the tip and clarification. I'll give it a try.
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 4:24 PM Magnus Kessler wrote:
> On 25 May 2017 at 09:39, Vladyslav Zakhozhai
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been trying to change dvv_enabled for default bucket
ually. But now I have no idea what can I do in this case. I
mean will siblings be resolved during read repairs, hinted handoffs, etc or
not. Or I do need to resolve them manually?
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:41 PM Vladyslav Zakhozhai <
v.zakhoz...@smartweb.com.ua> wrote:
> Hi Magn
re=false` may
> help in future. But won’t help with your keys with too many siblings.
>
> On 24 May 2017, at 09:22, Russell Brown wrote:
>
> >
> > On 24 May 2017, at 09:11, Vladyslav Zakhozhai <
> v.zakhoz...@smartweb.com.ua> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
22 matches
Mail list logo
