ng the clients at it, but it didn't help.
Riak is a high-availability key-value store, so... why are we failing to
achieve high-availability? Any suggestions greatly appreciated, and if more
info is required I'll do my best to provide it.
Thanks in advance,
Vanessa
--
a load-balancer
> and pointing the clients at it, but it didn't help." -- what do you mean
> exactly, by "it didn't help"? What happened when you tried using the load
> balancer?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Vanessa Williams <
> vanessa.wi
7;s
> not supposed to stop working completely. (I'm not sure why it's failing for
> you, we can investigate, but it'll be easier to just use a load balancer).
> It should throw an error or two, but then start working again (on the
> retry).
>
> Dmitri
>
> On W
do want to encourage you to bump your R setting to at least 2, though.
> Run some tests -- I think you'll find that the difference in speed will not
> be noticeable, but you do get a lot more data resilience with 2.)
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Vanessa Williams <
>
with less than 5 nodes:
>
> 1,2 nodes: n_val 1
> 3,4 nodes: n_val 2
> 5+ nodes: n_val 3
>
> In summary, please consider reconfiguring your production deployment.
>
> Sincerely,
> Alexander
>
> @siculars
> http://siculars.posthaven.com
>
> Sent from my iRota
help with the gory details. I'll be upgrading
from Riak 1.4.10 to Riak 2.1.2 (or whatever the latest is) shortly and I'll
take all of these points into consideration at that time.
Best regards,
Vanessa
Vanessa Williams
ThoughtWire Corporation
http://www.thoughtwire.com
On Thu, Oct 8,
hich means, read-before-you-write -- in
> fact, the Update operation in the java client does this for you, I think).
> And if Riak can't determine which version is correct, it will fall back on
> timestamps.
>
> 3) Turn on siblings, for that bucket or bucket type. That way, Ri
share the link! :)
>
Will do!
Regards,
Vanessa
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Vanessa Williams <
> vanessa.willi...@thoughtwire.ca> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dmitri, this thread is old, but I read this part of your answer
>> carefully:
&g
deleteFuture.await();
>
> if(deleteFuture.isSuccess())
> {
> return true;
> }
> else
> {
> deleteFuture.cause(); // Cause of failure
> return false;
> }
> }
>
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at
xample I posted. You can use the
> code you had as-is.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Vanessa Williams <
> vanessa.willi...@thoughtwire.ca> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex, would a second fetch just indicate that the object is *still*
>> d
Ok, here's a link:
http://www.fridgebuzz.com/2016/02/23/simple-key-value-java-client-for-riak/
There's a link to a Gist in there with the full source. Hope it helps
someone.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Vanessa Williams <
vanessa.willi...@thoughtwire.ca> wrote:
> Thank
11 matches
Mail list logo
