Hi everyone,
I have some questions regarding key composition and secondary indexes.
Key filters seem really useful, and because of this, I find myself designing
keys that have (perhaps) too many elements within them.
- Are there any best practices concerning key composition?
- Does the comp
Hi,
I'm having a problem with Ripple and logical operator key filters. Has
anyone managed to get "and" or "or" key filter combinations working?
When I run the following:
require 'ripple'
client = Riak::Client.new
bucket = client.bucket("test_bucket")
one = Riak::RObject.new(bucket, "test-123")
a really good chance that's wrong since I'm only looking at some
> Ruby in an editor and not testing against a running Riak cluster right now.
> Hopefully that sets you on the right track or else angries up someone who
> will correct me.
>
> ---
> Jeremiah Peschka
>
F
>
> On Sunday, June 5, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Ryan Caught wrote:
>
> Yeah, I did look at the spec. The first two results work fine, it's only
> the "and" based key filter that throws the error.
>
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Jeremiah Peschka <
> jeremiah.pesc..
Thanks Jeremiah. Nesting the "and" in another array worked great.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:58 PM, David Mitchell
wrote:
> The "and" based key filter is not working for me either. See:
> http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-June/004432.html
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> _
Hi,
I'm testing out a rolling upgrade with 1.0 pre2 and found that when I turn
off legacy_keylisting Riak crashes on me. Things work fine when
legacy_keylisting is turned on.
Here is what I found in the crash log.
2011-09-11 07:15:44 =SUPERVISOR REPORT
> Supervisor: {local,riak_pipe_fit
ting, but MapReduce. I hope to push out a new version of the Ruby
> client in the next few weeks to support the new features.
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Ryan Caught wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm testing out a rolling upgrade with 1.0 pre2 and found that when I turn
>&
lled in
> context child_terminated
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Daniel Reverri wrote:
> Hi Ryan
>
> Were there any errors in the error.log or console.log files?
>
> Thanks
> Dan
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Sep 11, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Ryan Caught wrote:
>
Hi Bryan,
Sorry for the delay, I was away. I shutdown that experiment, but intend to
try out one of the new prerelease's when I get the time. I'll try out what
you suggest if it brings up the same problems. I was running Ripple using
HTTP FYI.
Ryan
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Bryan Fink
If you are doing just a simple equality check in the key filter, then why
not skip key filters and lookup the key directly? Key filters are not
performant over large data sets.
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Jim Adler wrote:
> I'm trying to run a very simplified key filter that's timing out.
10 matches
Mail list logo
