I'm seeing different results when performing a 2i query with spaces on
different platforms. On OS X, I find the object. On an ubuntu vagrant
image used by Travis CI, I do not.
For example, here is my test script:
require 'riak'
client = Riak::Client.new
bucket = client.bucket("test")
Has anyone taken a look at this? I'm concerned that spaces and special
characters in secondary indexes are inconsistent.
Thanks,
Paul
On 7/20/12 5:12 PM, Paul Gross wrote:
I'm seeing different results when performing a 2i query with spaces on
different platforms. On OS X, I find
of Ubuntu
were you trying?
Kelly
On Jul 20, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Paul Gross <mailto:pgr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'm seeing different results when performing a 2i query with spaces
on different platforms. On OS X, I find the object. On an ubuntu
vagrant image used by Travis CI, I d
I upgraded riak on the vagrant image, and now I see consistent results
with spaces. I will follow up with Travis CI to upgrade their images.
Thanks,
Paul
www.pgrs.net
On 7/27/12 1:26 PM, Paul Gross wrote:
It's Ubuntu 11.10. I'm using the Travis Vagrant image, so you can
download th
- What is your wish list for the future of Secondary Indexes?
One thing that I would like to see is the ability to add secondary
indexes after the fact to existing objects. The use case I'm thinking of is:
1. I have a bucket of users, where the key is generated and the value is
a hash o
On 11/16/11 2:20 PM, Alexander Sicular wrote:
Because of the way riak stores a key's value as basically one big blob
in one place on disk, I don't think it is possible. This is akin to
the often requested ability to update a keys meta data independent of
its "value". But as far as riak storag
6) Q --- Are people running riak natively on osx (for development) or
running on a vm that matches production? (from kenperkins via #riak)
A --- Anyone? (We had a similar thread on the list several months
back about this but I figured it couldn't hurt to open it up to more
discussion.)
We
rmines how many ports I need?
Thanks,
Paul Gross
www.pgrs.net
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
I'm setting up a new cluster with an iptables firewall, and I'm
trying to figure out which ports to open. It looks like I need 4369,
8099, 8098 (http), and a configurable range. Can I configure the
range to be a single port, or is there a minimum number of required
ports? What determines how many
A range of 1 might work, but I'd go for a range of 5 or so, just to be
safe.
Thanks for the guideline. Can you give me some insight on when riak
would use more than one port?
Thanks,
Paul
www.pgrs.net
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.bash
What are some examples of use cases for one-way replication?
A disaster recovery cluster in an alternate data center in case the
production data center goes down.
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailma
While the idea of Luwak was interesting, we ultimately decided that it
wasn’t the architectural path we wanted to pursue for storing larger
values in Riak.
Does this mean there is still an intention to support storing larger
values in Riak in the future?
Or is this something the client libraries
We at Braintree (http://www.braintreepayments.com/) open sourced our
Riak ORM for Ruby called Curator. It follows a repository pattern rather
than an ActiveRecord or Ripple pattern.
You can check out the code on github:
https://github.com/braintree/curator
We also released a blog post that exp
.g. is it quicker to do the lookup against a key,
rather than a secondary index?
Dave
On 21 Feb 2012, at 15:29, Paul Gross wrote:
We at Braintree (http://www.braintreepayments.com/) open sourced our
Riak ORM for Ruby called Curator. It follows a repository pattern
rather than an ActiveReco
Riak is a breeze to host and maintain, but more difficult to develop
against than other NoSQL databases (e.g. MongoDB and Redis). I think it
would help adoption to close the developer gap. This includes things like:
1. Add other data types like lists and sets. With lists, features like
blockin
1. Add other data types like lists and sets. With lists, features
like blocking pop would be great.
Please consider how such a feature would behave in the presence of a
network partition. This *is* possible, but there are significant
consistency or performance tradeoffs required.
Conceptually
4. Add the concept of ordering (without having to fall back to
map/reduce). It's difficult to do paging without ordering, and most
webapps require it. In general, paging in RIak is hard, since
there's no concept of a range of results from a secondary index.
I thought there were range queries for
17 matches
Mail list logo
