RIAK-CS / FreeBSD 10.2 - Start error

riak-cs chkconfig config is OK -config /usr/local/riak-cs/generated.configs/app.2015.09.15.01.41.39.config -args_file /usr/local/riak-cs/generated.configs/vm.2015.09.15.01.41.39.args -vm_args /usr/local/riak-cs/generated.configs/vm.2015.09.15.01.41.39.args root@vmbsd:/usr/local/etc/riak # riak-cs s

Re: RIAK-CS / FreeBSD 10.2 - Start error

-Riak/#Allowing-for-Sibling-Creation > . > Hi yeah, I remembered the allow_mult needed to be in riak.conf Thanks Ive gotten past it > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Outback Dingo > wrote: > > riak-cs chkconfig > > config is OK > > -c

adding auth user not valid

seems the docs with auth creds is invalid... or im still broken... curl -XPOST http://localhost:8080/riak-cs/user \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"email":"ad...@admin.com", "name":"admin"}' returns curl -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -X POST http://localhost:8080/riak-cs

package forbidden / freeBSD 10

cant seem to install Riak CS Control on FreeBSD 10.2 and its no longer listed on the site http://s3.amazonaws.com/downloads.basho.com/riak-cs-control/1.0/1.0.2/freebsd/10//riak-cs-control-1.0.2-FreeBSD-amd64.txz: Forbidden ___ riak-users mailing list ria

Re: package forbidden / freeBSD 10

o Technologies > t: @mjbrender > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Outback Dingo > wrote: > > > > cant seem to install Riak CS Control on FreeBSD 10.2 and its no longer > listed on the site > > > > > http://s3.amazonaws.com/downloads.basho.com/riak-

Re: adding auth user not valid

useful to > investigate the communication between riak-cs and stanchion. > > Thanks, > Shino > more like ENOTENOUGHNODES. pretty perplexing to chase down when you think somethings running and its not anyway i got it sorted out thanks,. > > 2015-09-15 13:21 GMT+0

Re: Riak S2 2.1 is available

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Matthew Brender wrote: > Hello all, > > Riak S2 2.1 (aka Riak CS) is available. Thanks to all who made it happen! > > Here are the highlights of the release: > * New metrics that enable you to determine the health of your Riak S2 > system, as well as get reports o

RIAK TS - FreeBSD

Curious why there is no FreeBSD pkg for RIAK TS on the web site. ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Re: Riak Recap, May 20th, 2016

ect in Riak [15]. Welcome >>aboard, David! >>- >> >>Kaz helps a different David by pointing out two key Riak KV >>configuration options when setting up KV for Riak CS [16]. >>- >> >>Vitaly helps Alex with Solr indexing [17] and Drew

Re: Seeking Backup solution for live nodes

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Matthew Von-Maszewski wrote: > Neither. > > The leveldb instance creates a snapshot of the current files and generates a > working MANIFEST to go with them. That means the snapshot is in “ready to > run” condition. This is based upon hard links for the .sst tabl

Re: Is Riak dead?

well, if thats the case someone best be starting a new site and mailing list soon in case this one dissappears On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Russell Brown wrote: > Hi Senthilkumar, > No Riak is not dead. It’s parent company, Basho is dead. And they kept the > keys. There are numerous forks t

Re: Is Riak dead?

zombie, rumoured to >> be litigious. Circumspection is required. >> >> It’ll happen. Don’t worry. >> >> On 13 Jul 2017, at 17:51, Outback Dingo wrote: >> >> > well, if thats the case someone best be starting a new site and >> > mailing list soon in case

Re: Is Riak dead?

i have compute resources if you need to host a vm or other... On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:50 PM, DeadZen wrote: > Awesome! Ill forward details to here for a new fork, mailing list and > academy. > > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:41 PM Outback Dingo > wrote: >> >>

Re: Is Riak dead?

I dont believe abandon is the proper term, resurrect and carry forth, we will not let you go quietly into the night LETS DO THIS SHIT! Ive got cloud resources I own... servers/VMS/XEN Ill do it myself if I need tooo. On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Alexander Sicular wrote: > Abandon hope all ye

Re: Is Riak dead?

VMS as in Virtual Machine(S) On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Christopher Meiklejohn < christopher.meiklej...@gmail.com> wrote: > VMS? I don't think we ever got Riak compiling on Alpha. 💛😀 > > On Jul 13, 2017 1:30 PM, "Outback Dingo" wrote: > >> I

Re: Is Riak dead?

oke. :) > > Always better explained. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DEC_Alpha) > >> >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Outback Dingo >> wrote: >> VMS as in Virtual Machine(S) >> >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Christopher Meiklejohn >> wr

Re: Is Riak dead?

> If anyone was close to getting Riak working on Alpha or VAX, it would have > been Andrew Thompson. > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:14 PM, DeadZen wrote: > >> Rackspace has provided some resources, love all the feedback. >> >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 PM Outbac

Re: Is Riak dead?

i see 0 issue with simply renaming the project, its still the same software under the hood.. it cant be that hard to create an open source fork under a different name and carry forward On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 6:43 PM, wrote: > Perhaps we can get overview of legal issues and options here: > >

Re: Riak and the demise of Basho

Apache2 or BSD On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Damien Krotkine wrote: > +1 for Apache2 > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017, at 19:05, Neeraj Sharma wrote: >> +1 for Apache 2. Thanks for making it open source. >> >> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Bill Barnhill >> wrote: >> > +1 for Apache 2. Thank you so mu