basho bench 64 bit

2010-07-23 Thread Michael Colussi
Has anyone tried compiling basho bench on 64 bit linux? Debian in particular? I get this error when I run make: ./rebar get-deps ==> protobuffs (get-deps) ==> riakc (get-deps) ==> casbench (get-deps) ==> ibrowse (get-deps) ==> stats (get-deps) ==> basho_bench (get-deps) ./rebar compile test escr

Re: basho bench 64 bit

2010-07-23 Thread Michael Colussi
It was a 32 bit version of R14B04, built from source. The issue was caused by trying to install a 64 bit version of basho bench on top of it. Anyway, I realized that this was silly, and then installed a 64 bit R14B04 build of erlang. Unfortunately now when I run make, basho bench complains that

system_memory_high_watermark

2010-08-31 Thread Michael Colussi
Hey guys, I've been successfully running component tests where I launch two Riak nodes on the same computer and join them. I'm trying to update my Riak version 0.12, but as soon as I join the nodes I get a *system_memory_high_watermark *alarm and then both Riak instances crash. Has anyone else e

Re: system_memory_high_watermark

2010-08-31 Thread Michael Colussi
I'm using ets actually, and the nodes crash before I store any key/value pairs. I only get this on my debian linux box btw. It works fine in darwin. ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-user

Re: system_memory_high_watermark

2010-08-31 Thread Michael Colussi
Hi Dan, They were both running 0.12, but I started over with *tip* and I haven't had the issue yet. If I see it again I'll be sure to post the logs. Thanks, Mike ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/list

badarg ets delete

2010-09-16 Thread Michael Colussi
Hey guys I have an application using Riak 0.12 that does puts, gets, and updates. It works fine but I get these random error reports in my logs. Any ideas? ERROR <0.149.0> ** Generic server <0.149.0> terminating ** Last message in was stop ** When Server state == {state,139315} ** Reason for ter

bitcask 42?

2010-09-30 Thread Michael Colussi
Hey guys, My team was trying to launch a 63 node Riak cluster yesterday, using version 0.13rc3 and the bitcask backend. All 63 nodes agreed that the ring consisted of nodes 1-42 only. Any ideas? Is there a hardcoded limit to the number of nodes allowed? _