Social network data / Graph properties of Riak

2011-11-18 Thread Jeroen van Dijk
Hi all, I'm currently evaluating whether Riak would fit as the main storage of my current project, a social network. The reason I am attracted to Riak and less to a Graph database as main storage is that I want the easy horizontal scalability and multi-site replication that Riak provides. The only

RE: Social network data / Graph properties of Riak

2011-11-18 Thread Jeroen van Dijk
I didn't include the riak list... -- Forwarded message -- From: Jeroen van Dijk Date: Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:36 PM Subject: Re: Social network data / Graph properties of Riak To: Eric Moritz On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Eric Moritz wrote: > If you're stor

RE: Social network data / Graph properties of Riak

2011-11-18 Thread Jeroen van Dijk
it feasible? Did I grasp what you were proposing Kyle? Thanks, Jeroen > --Kyle > > > On 11/18/2011 07:38 AM, Jeroen van Dijk wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm currently evaluating whether Riak would fit as the main storage of >> my current project, a social ne

Re: Social network data / Graph properties of Riak

2011-11-19 Thread Jeroen van Dijk
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Aphyr wrote: > On 11/18/2011 11:50 AM, Jeroen van Dijk wrote: > >> And I also didn't include the riak user list for this reply: >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Aphyr > <mailto:ap...@aphyr.com>> wrote: >

Using (parts of) Bitcask backend as a cache store

2011-11-29 Thread Jeroen van Dijk
Hi all, I'm currently investigating of how to structure my data in Riak. I'm thinking of having buckets that have the purpose of storing the raw data and having buckets that store certain views on this data to minimize lookups and mapreduce operations at runtime. So the latter would in effect be a

Re: Using (parts of) Bitcask backend as a cache store

2011-11-29 Thread Jeroen van Dijk
: + 45 2343 4626 | Skype: krestenkrabthorup | Twitter: @drkrab > Trifork A/S | Margrethepladsen 4 | DK- 8000 Aarhus C | Phone : +45 > 8732 8787 | www.trifork.com<http://www.trifork.com/> > > > > On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Jeroen van Dijk wrote: > > Hi all,

Riak search performance FUD

2011-11-30 Thread Jeroen van Dijk
Hi all, I'm currently evaluating the search functionality of Riak. This involves porting an application from Postgres/Sphinx to possibly only Riak. The application I'm porting doesn't need advanced search, but it does need a level of search I have come to believe this isn't provided in a feasible

Re: Riak search performance FUD

2011-12-01 Thread Jeroen van Dijk
FYI I got this reaction from Elias (this is a forward it to the list so it will be archived correctly. Thank you Elias btw) On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Elias Levy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:01 AM, wrote: > >> From: Jeroen van Dijk >> >> The use case I

Re: Riak search performance FUD

2011-12-01 Thread Jeroen van Dijk
d to be a part of the public API. > Thanks for this advise :) > Hope that helps, > Definitely, thank you. Cheers, Jeoren > Best, > Rusty > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Jeroen van Dijk < > jeroentjevand...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >>