Hi Riak users!
I'm looking at the sample here:
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/using/2i/ and wondering if there is a
way to use more complicated logic when using 2i input filters to limit the
input to a MapReduce function.
For example, can I do stuff like "index1_bin in range[1,10] OR in ra
he objects key-value)
Thanks,
Gints
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Gints Gailītis wrote:
> Hi Riak users!
>
> I'm looking at the sample here:
> http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/using/2i/ and wondering if there is
> a way to use more complicated logic when using 2i inpu
Well, I guess they're working on it -
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/running/nodes/adding-removing/#The-Node-Join-Process-
but for now, that's just something we have to live with during node
addition / removal.
Also, I guess, if you do it all in one go, it just finishes faster,
decreasing t
Sure enough, I had a break; where a continue; should be in my map function
loop, which caused me to lose some siblings. Meh, all is fine now, sorry
for the spam - it's been a long day :)
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Gints Gailītis wrote:
> Oh, OK, I think I just got it - the third
Sorry, should have mentioned that, I do set allow_mult=true.
Also, it seems I had a problem with my initial test - what was failing to
find the object was my map reduce query, a simple find by key worked just
fine. But now there seem to be two issues:
1) How does Riak handle siblings when doing a
, that second vclock is now out of date too, at that moment, since the
first delete already updated the object. If that's correct, then scratch 2)
off the list.
Then the only question left is 1) siblings in map reduce - how do I access
them?
Thanks,
Gints
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:26 PM,
