Apologies if this is basic question, or one that's already been
answered. I've done a fair amount of digging (e.g.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.riak.user/12808/focus=12816), but
I'm still confused about the documentation regarding conflict resolution
for riak's crdt counter. Specific
iak's counters were PN...which I think is what you're
saying...except the part about them behaving as G-Counters.
Sorry if I'm a little slow on the uptake here, and thanks again for your
help.
-DB
Hope this helps,
Jason
____
Whoops...didn't mean to drop the mailing list off the recipient list.
Pull request here: https://github.com/basho/basho_docs/pull/1865.
-DB
On 10/21/15 7:52 AM, David Byron wrote:
On 10/20/15 11:56 PM, Russell Brown wrote:
On 21 Oct 2015, at 04:56, David Byron wrote:
Apologies if
As I stare at the code for RiakMap in the riak-java-client
(https://github.com/basho/riak-java-client/blob/develop/src/main/java/com/basho/riak/client/core/query/crdt/types/RiakMap.java),
I have the urge for a simpler implementation.
If I'm reading the code right, it looks like it handles a val
From my reading of RiakCommand#execute
(https://github.com/basho/riak-java-client/blob/develop/src/main/java/com/basho/riak/client/api/RiakCommand.java#L85),
I'm curious why there's no call to
future.isSuccess()
I can imagine that future.await() throws an exception for all possible
failures,
I'm implementing a health check for a service of mine that uses riak.
I've seen this code from
https://github.com/basho/riak-java-client/issues/456:
RiakCluster cluster = clientInstance.getRiakCluster();
List nodes = cluster.getNodes();
for (RiakNode node : nodes)
{
State state = node.getNode
g a stale
notion of health in circumstances like I outlined below -- when the last
operation was successful, but the node has since gone down.
Thanks for your input.
-DB
On 12/2/15 10:25 PM, David Byron wrote:
I'm implementing a health check for a service of mine that uses riak.
I
d to their primary physical machines. This is a way you can check
cluster status from the app level as in , is the cluster in some kind of borked
state.
-Alexander
@siculars
http://siculars.posthaven.com
Sent from my iRotaryPhone
On Dec 8, 2015, at 14:13, David Byron wrote:
I'm still cu
I'm looking for access to the location member of FetchDatatype
(https://github.com/basho/riak-java-client/blob/develop/src/main/java/com/basho/riak/client/api/commands/datatypes/FetchDatatype.java#L37)
to verify in a test that I'm using the right location.
I'm happy to make a pull request if th
On 1/14/16 7:40 AM, Alex Moore wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> It doesn't look like we expose that property anywhere, but it can
> probably be chalked up to YAGNI when it was written. Go forth and
> PR :)
Excellent...except for this at the HEAD of develop (24e1404).
$ mvn clean install
[INFO] Scanning
brew you can use this
<http://stackoverflow.com/a/23760535> procedure to install the older
protobuf lib (just swap protobuf241 for protobuf250).
Thanks,
Alex
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:22 PM, David Byron mailto:dby...@dbyron.com>> wrote:
On 1/14/16 7:40 AM, Alex Moore wrote:
> H
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/community/faqs/operations/#is-it-possible-to-change-the-port-on-which-the-erl
says to add
-env ERL_EPMD_PORT
to vm.args, but I get the sense from
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/advanced/configs/configuration-files/
that the goal is to avoid vm.args in
: this is not very well documented (if at all), and
I've seen many people ask about it (be it for vm options, or adding
paths, etc). It might be useful to ad some documentation section about it.
Cheers,
dams
Christopher Meiklejohn wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:24 PM, David Byron wrote:
I'm pondering upgrading riak from 2.1.3 to 2.1.4 and got myself confused
confirming that I really am running 2.1.3 at the moment.
I installed riak from here:
https://packagecloud.io/basho/riak/packages/ubuntu/trusty/riak_2.1.3-1_amd64.deb.
and all of this looks promising:
$ riak version
2.1.
, so those two version numbers
are not necessarily going to always be the same.
Doug Rohrer
On Apr 22, 2016, at 2:28 PM, David Byron wrote:
I'm pondering upgrading riak from 2.1.3 to 2.1.4 and got myself confused
confirming that I really am running 2.1.3 at the moment.
I installed riak
15 matches
Mail list logo
