Hi all, I was messing around with basho_bench and I think it created a
'test' bucket with lots of binary keys, not string keys. Using the
.NET api (http://corrugatediron.org/) and it fails to delete these
keys. Any suggestions how I can get rid of this bucket, aside from
stopping all nodes and dele
Jeremiah, OK I see- thanks for explaining it. Yeah I will just nuke
the data, and will be more careful with basho_bench in the future:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Jeremiah Peschka
wrote:
> If this is a big show stopper for you, let me know and I can see what it
> would take to put in a flag
into it as
> soon as I get a chance. You can track the issue here
> https://github.com/DistributedNonsense/CorrugatedIron/issues/171
>
> ---
> Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar Unlimited
> MCITP: SQL Server 2008, MVP
> Cloudera Certified Developer for Apache Hadoop
>
&
Is there a way to trick corrugatediron into serializing a protobuf
class for me? I know I can serialize it to byte[] myself and Put that.
But I thought setting the ContentType might do the trick, but it looks
like it's getting saved as JSON instead. This might be a convenient
feature to add.
// cr
Hi I'm very new to Riak. The allow_mult = true / Siblings feature is
very interesting. Could it be used to implement a high performance
collection like a Queue or Set, in a lock free manner? The Riak docs
make it sound like allow_mult is mainly for confict resolution and
degenerate cases, rather t
d tail of the queue (Not so
> true for LinkedBlockingQueue)
>
> And performance of several CRDT for high performance queue I don't actually
> think is going to be good.
>
> If I were to use Riak for my big data environment and would like to match
> Riak on a distributed q
Hi all, coming from a traditional database background of course my
first tendency was wanting to auto_increment a primary key somewhere.
Not possible with Riak, obviously! :)
I was wondering if anyone has a good link or white paper about short
length hash key creation. I want to keep my keys short
Although with 40 bytes per key overhead, which I just read about,
perhaps this is somewhat of a ridiculous optimization for me to be
attempting to shorten the key size ? :)
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Alex Rice wrote:
> Hi all, coming from a traditional database background of course
That is awesome! thanks Jeremiah - I really need to take the time to
browse through all your stuff on Gitub :)
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Jeremiah Peschka
wrote:
> Howdy Alex!
>
> It's not ludicrous at all since changes in Riak 2.0 should reduce that
> overhead to about 13 bytes per key,
Ah thanks Brian, that's good to know!
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Brian Sparrow wrote:
> In addition to Jeremiah's suggestions I would suggest using single character
> bucket names. This will save you loads of memory in the long run as each key
> in bitcask has its bucket prepended onto its
Hi all, so is this a common problem? I was just casually playing
around with the LevelDB backend, and observed the disk space was not
freed, even though all my keys are deleted. Riak 1.4.2
Thanks
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
htt
Hi all, I am using C# corrugatedIron client. I would like to get a
verbose log of all of my Riak queries and calls. To help during
development. Whether it's on the client side, or on the server side
(maybe some lager settings in app.config?) doesnt matter. I have been
searching for a way to get thi
Hi all, if rekon lists "undefined" for all attributes and value of a
key, what does that mean? I suspect there are siblings for the key,
but it's not clear from how rekon is displaying the info.
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http
Thanks OJ-- as well I happenned to notice this
https://github.com/xb95/riak-sniffer
But in my case since I'm connecting to Riak Linux cluster mostly from
Windows servers, that wouldnt really help.
Mostly I'm just trying to debug my own bad code on the client side :)
___
Hey, something that is impressive about Riak is how well it performs
even on super low end cloud virtualization (unlike for example,
couchbase, which hardly runs at all unless you have quad cores per
each node)
Having so much fun benchmarking, it's really distracting me from coding!
the cluster
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Tom Santero wrote:
> Nice.
>
> Can you share your bb config? Is this against leveldb or bitcask? I'm
> assuming leveldb, considering the limited RAM on these instances. If thats
> the case, I suggest running your benchmarks for longer than 20 minutes (i.e.
> severa
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Alex Rice wrote:
> I am using this in a production environment
I am ** considering** using this in a production environment :)
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mail
Just trying to make sure I understand what is the proper usage of this
option IfNotModified in CI.
// (first do a Get of the object)
// do a SetObject on the riakobject with my changes
var putOpts = new RiakPutOptions () { IfNotModified = true };
// do a Put with those Options
When the put fails,
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Tom Santero wrote:
> Yeah, I noticed the "bitcask" in the dropbox url after I sent the email. Be
> sure to keep an eye on memory utilization on each node.
>
> Best of luck generating revenue!
Thanks! Here is a 2 hour graph. Seems pretty solid! The only change was
using IfNotModified = true. Just wondering if that is to
be expected or maybe worth filing an enhancement request on github?
Because it's not really a CommunicationError :)
Alex
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Alex Rice wrote:
> Just trying to make sure I understand what is the proper usage
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Christopher Meiklejohn
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Can you provide a screenshot of what you are experiencing?
Hi Chris, sure- sometimes rekon returns "undefined" strings - I
haven't been able to nail down what's causing it. I am guessing it's
related to multi / siblings
Thanks for the link, James!
Windows Azure has an odd SLA- in fact if you read the fine print they
dont even offer SLA for individual VMs. They reserve the right to take
down individual VMs if they need to do an upgrades of the Host OS. But
they offer 'availability zones' so you can make sure only
Just trying to paraphrase how I understand it from the Riak docs, plus
helpful feedback from Jeremiah :) Please correct if I'm not really
groking it!
with allow_multi = false, the default setting
- To achieve CAS* -ish behavior for updates, you can always send the
vector clock with a Put. If it f
Hi all, unable to find these in the Riak docs
1) Can someone point me at directions for cleanup of orphaned Links
after an object is Deleted from Riak. Post-commit hooks or something?
I really hope I dont have to learn Erlang just to clean up bad links
after deleting objects!
2) Are links stored
Eric- thanks for this! I had no idea that Links were not recommended
for new deployments, so glad I asked on here :)
Alex
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Eric Redmond wrote:
>
> On Oct 6, 2013 4:35 PM, "Alex Rice" wrote:
>>
>> Hi all, unable to find these in the Ri
Are they ordered by timestamp, and is the ordering guaranteed? (within
the clock accuracy of course). Using the C# client Thanks,
Alex
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.c
> There's no guarantee of return order as far as I know. Since you can't count
> on clocks anyway...
>
> Are you trying to determine which data modifications to apply from multiple
> siblings?
>
> ---
> sent from a tiny portion of the hive mind...
> in this c
Yeah so it seems oldest/newest is a flawed notion I have to get over!
Siblings are so *ZEN* :)
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Alex Rice wrote:
> Yes, exactly that's what I'm working on. By knowing which sibling is
> the oldest and which is the newest it seems like I can usua
Just an informal poll- what is preferred for Linux vm.swappiness
setting for Riak in a *cloud* environment? The default is 60 - a lot
of stuff gets swapped out. This is good for OS disk cache.
I am thinking vm.swappiness = 0
- Avoid slow & potentially costly I/O operations in the virtualized envi
Thanks for confirming, Matthew! That might be a good check for the
startup script, much like I think it currently complains about ulimit
is not set to the Max.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Matthew Von-Maszewski
wrote:
> recommend value for Riak is zero.
>
> On Oct 16, 2013, at 4:28
Hey I would like some swag! Or schwag, or even some bling! Seriously I
submitted the survey, but realized later that this is one of the data
types I would love to see in Riak:
http://redis.io/commands#sorted_set
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Hector Castro wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We'd since
Aha! thanks for that tip
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Jared Morrow wrote:
> It is checked by 'riak-admin diag' if you run that to check your system.
>
> -Jared
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Alex Rice wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for confi
ex.html (for those of you who haven't seen
> Salt Stack yet)
>
> Basho now has a dedicated conference page on Lanyrd, if you're curious where
> you can find us next
> - http://lanyrd.com/basho/
>
> While we're talking about 2.0 and CRDTs at RICON West, Joel Jaco
.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22076075/summary-medium-bitcask-5nodes-30-min.png
Anyways- back to work for me!!!
:)
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Alex Rice wrote:
> Hey, something that is impressive about Riak is how well it performs
> even on super low end cloud virtualization (unlike for ex
{value_generator, {fixed_bin, 1}}.
> {riakc_pb_replies, 1}.
> {operations, [{get, 3}, {put, 1} ]}.
> ]
>
>
> On 28/10/13 06:35, Alex Rice wrote:
>>
>> Here is an updated 2 hour graph of the same "X-Small" 5-node cluster,
>> after having perfo
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/10/seagate-introduces-a-new-drive-interface-ethernet/
that article only mentions Riak in passing in same sentence with
Mongo- boo! I noticed the blog post up on basho.com about it.
http://basho.com/basho-releases-ekinetic-driver-and-integrated-riak
Thanks for the heads-up sounds simple enough to add to the Riak
startup script in /etc/init.d
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Evan Vigil-McClanahan
wrote:
> I replied to this (accidentally) off-list. For the rest of you folks,
> if you want to follow the resolution you can add yourself to the
>
37 matches
Mail list logo