Yes - looks like its going that way too - a decoupling between the Solr Cloud
and the Riak Cluster seems like a solution that could work out and then
Yokozuna to index content out to the Solr Cloud (completely external to riak
- Solr not made to baby sit in Riak) - In this arrangement we could main
On Sep 18, 2014, at 4:20 AM, anandm wrote:
> Yes - looks like its going that way too - a decoupling between the Solr Cloud
> and the Riak Cluster seems like a solution that could work out and then
> Yokozuna to index content out to the Solr Cloud (completely external to riak
> - Solr not made to
Yes Ryan - that aspect is pretty clear. So with 1-1 riak-solr Yokozuna
deployment scale to my requirement? Am I missing something here when
thinking it wouldn't?
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Yokozuna-Scale-tp4031808p4031814.html
Sent from the Riak User
On Sep 18, 2014, at 10:35 AM, anandm wrote:
> Yes Ryan - that aspect is pretty clear. So with 1-1 riak-solr Yokozuna
> deployment scale to my requirement? Am I missing something here when
> thinking it wouldn't?
I haven’t followed this thread closely, it was just your last
email that caught my
Could someone please point me toward some authoritative documentation on
whether a Riak cluster running version 1.2 can be upgraded in rolling fashion
to 2.0 directly, without going through an intermediate release? We generally
held back on 1.4 due to some of the growing pains we perceived aroun
