Hi everyone!
I figured out what my bottleneck was - HTTP API + sequential (as opposed to
concurrent) GET requests.
I wrote a simple Erlange Cowboy handler that uses a worker pool OTP application
I built to make concurrent GETs using the PBC api. My Python web app makes a
call to the handler an
Hi,
Just installed riak and trying to get adjusted. Having looked at the java
client, I could not tell if there' a way to check key exixtence. What I
need to do is to check if a key exists and put it if it doesn't. In HTTP
request from curl, a HEAD request instead of a GET gives the result I need
Hi,
I ran the following Java snippet that creates a bucket, stores a key/value
pair in it, deletes the key, and adds a new value for that same key. The
n-value is 3 and all r- and w-values are also set to 3 to ensure full
consistency (for testing only). Here's the code:
public static void mai
The client might not support that, I don't know. I know the Python client (at
least the version I'm using) also does a full GET of the object.
Here's the kicker though, I'm using LevelDB for the backend and LevelDB is
notorious for having poor read performance when you're trying to GET a key tha
Mark
On Jul 28, 2012, at 10:55, Parnell Springmeyer wrote:
> The client might not support that, I don't know. I know the Python client (at
> least the version I'm using) also does a full GET of the object.
>
> Here's the kicker though, I'm using LevelDB for the backend and LevelDB is
> not
I am using Riak as the persistence data store for a distributed data
grid so I really do not care to use Riak's or in my case eLevelDb's
cache. The problem I have is that when I load 10 million keys into
Riak it is taking 3.6g of memory. I have not set any of the eLevelDb
backend configuration para
