I'm building a macos gui for various nosql/key-value/document servers and have
a few questions. For Riak I'm looking into whether it would it be better to use
the HTTP interface, PBC interface, or use one of the client libraries.
It looks like the HTTP interface is the most mature feature-wise.
Sounds like a great project. Comments inline. -Alexander
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Alex Leverington wrote:
>
> I'm building a macos gui for various nosql/key-value/document servers and
> have a few questions. For Riak I'm looking into whether it would it be
> better to use the HTTP interf
Hi,
Decided to bite the bullet and upgrade to 1.1.2 (Eric Mortiz's
previous answer turned of javascript, but the application was still
loading).
So i start a node called "web_common_test" (JS turned off, otherwise a
basic setup).
Output from application:info().
{riakc,"Riak Client","1.
Hi,
I am new to riak and some of our databases are going live with riak. My
question is though all the installation is to be done under root account, my
group will be responsible for diagnosing and fixing alerts. What level of
access we need for monitoring. If "Riak" user is used by support
I fixed this. Path conflicts had different versions of riak.
Quoting r...@radardisc.co.nz:
Hi,
Decided to bite the bullet and upgrade to 1.1.2 (Eric Mortiz's
previous answer turned of javascript, but the application was still
loading).
So i start a node called "web_common_test" (JS turne
Riak Users,
As some of you have noticed we have been committing small changes here and
there to help support building Riak on BSD's. We have now gone taken the next
step to officially support a BSD with packages in a release. I wrote up a
short blog post about our coming support for FreeBSD