Hi,
We have Riak cluster running 1.1.2. All the nodes own 6.6% of partitions,
still memory usage of "beam" process on some nodes is less than the others
(significantly). The number of keys on the nodes consuming less memory is
also fewer.
Then how come they still own the equal number of partition
Suggest implementing security outside of riak. The interface to applications
which use riak for storage should not be riak-dependent. In addition, it would
be wise to avoid exposing storage-level details like bucket choice in the
security model for your applications.
For more details in why ria
Dear colleagues,
Any idea how to adjust the processing capacity of the Riak JavaScript in
the Map / Reduce process to avoid the error [preflist_exhausted] ?
Checking the user posts, I also see a similar error report sent at 29/05
by Mr. Sati, Hohit.
The Map/Reduce and search capability are i
I saw something similar from an individual who was using javascript
(http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-July/004843.html),
but I don't think I have the same problem in erlang. Any help is greatly
appreciated.
I'm consistently getting the following error from my cu
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:22 PM, John Roy wrote:
> I saw something similar from an individual who was using javascript (
> http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-July/004843.html),
> but
> I don't think I have the same problem in erlang. Any help is greatly
> appreciate
Excellent -- that helped a great deal.
For those who may search in the future the most important thing is to have the
output of your final step (a reduce in my case) be a list of {Key :: Binary,
Value :: json_term()} as Bob identified below.
In a standard map reduce that means the input to th
