Hi Mark,
Yes, that solution worked for me - thanks.
Chris.
From: Mark Phillips [m...@basho.com]
Sent: 04 May 2012 16:58
To: Walters Chris (NHS CONNECTING FOR HEALTH)
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Install riak from source without github access
Hi Wa
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>
> Hi Mark, I'm the riak EDS 'maintainer'. Sorry I didn't reply earlier, I
> was travelling all week.
>
Hi Andrew, glad to hear from you!
> I understand that the open source version of Riak's replication is
> designed
> > for single data ce
We are currently running a 4 node cluster with 1.1.2 on Ubuntu 10.04, and
are experiencing an issue where losing a single node has cause the entire
cluster to fail.
Nagios reported that node 1 had failed, shortly after, all the logs are filled
with:
2012-05-08 08:13:22.319 [error] <0.27873.2568>
Hey Armon,
So "monitor busy_dist_port" means your nodes aren't talking but we need to
figure out why. Specifically it looks like you're kv vnodes aren't able to
communicate.
First questions
* Which backend are you using?
* What OS?
* What size are your values?
* What is the typical traffic (ops/
Hey,
The cluster is back up and running by going through the following steps:
1) Force terminate east-riak-001 using the AWS console
2) "riak-admin down r...@east-riak-001.cluster.kiip.me" on ALL nodes
3) riak stop && riak start on ALL nodes
All the nodes appeared to have been blocked tryi
>>> "ar" == Armon Dadgar wrote:
ar> All the nodes appeared to have been blocked trying to talk to riak
ar> 001 which was the ring claimant at the time. Doing this seems to
ar> have cleared the state enough for the cluster to make progress
ar> again.
Armon, it's quite unlikely that the ring claim
Hey Scott,
My mistake, I was not sure if the claimant was responsible for convergence.
If this was a competition, it was not one that would ever finish… The node went
down at about 1AM, and by 9AM when I started to resolve the issue it was in
the same state. I was unable to investigate the stat
Where by "competition", I meant "compaction". Derp.
Best Regards,
Armon Dadgar
On Tuesday, May 8, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Armon Dadgar wrote:
> Hey Scott,
>
> My mistake, I was not sure if the claimant was responsible for convergence.
>
> If this was a competition, it was not one that would eve
Hi Riak-users,
I'm looking for an efficient way of passing multiple arguments to mapreduce
functions, Instead of
passing a JSON (or other custom string representation of arguments) and
being forced to parse
it on every map/reduce function call, i.e.:
Now:
//Passing: arg = {"a":"0", "b":"1"}
//Ex
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 10:59:19AM -0400, Mark Rose wrote:
>
> Approximately how fast is "eventually"? Is it based on the network
> bandwidth/latency between the clusters or is there additional latency?
> Basically, would I expect more or less than a second if the two clusters
> were 250 ms away?
10 matches
Mail list logo
