Hey guys,
Still a relative newbie here.
I was hoping to be able to setup a MapReduce job that I could feed 1000
keys to, and have it tell me of the 1000, which keys exist in the bucket.
I was hoping this could use the key index (such a thing exists right?)
without having to read the objects.
Th
You can use the $keys index to grab this information out of Riak. You could
also write an MR job that returns just the key for every key that exists, but
you would still have to read everything from disk... Or I think so, could be
wrong.
---
Jeremiah Peschka, Managing Director, Brent Ozar PLF,
I'm testing a script that joins my riak ring on all machines. There is no
data in the database yet but I have repeated joined the ring
an separated it while working on the script that sets up the environment on
my machines. The ring is now in a bizarre state:
[rebecca]$ riak-admin member_status
At
Hi,
We have a 12-node Riak cluster. Until now we were naming every new node as
riak@. We then decided to rename the all the nodes to
riak@, which makes troubleshooting easier.
After issuing reip command to two nodes, we noticed in the "status" that those
2 nodes were now appearing in the cluste
First question: what version of Riak are you running?
Mark
On May 2, 2012, at 11:05, Nitish Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
> We have a 12-node Riak cluster. Until now we were naming every new node as
> riak@. We then decided to rename the all the nodes to
> riak@, which makes troubleshooting easier.
>
Hi Nitish,
If you rebuild the cluster with the same ring size, the data will
eventually get back to the right place. While the rebuild is taking place
you may have notfounds for gets until the data has been handed off to the
newly assigned owner (as it will be secondary handoff, not primary
owner
Hi Jon,
Thanks for your input. I've already started working on that lines.
I stopped all the nodes, moved ring directory from one node, brought that one
up, and issued join command to one other node (after moving the ring directory)
- node2. While they were busy re-distributing the partitions, I
Hi Nitish, for this to work you'll have to stop all the nodes at the same
time, clear the ring on all nodes, start up all nodes, then rejoin
If you clear the rings one node at a time, when you rejoin the nodes the
ring with the old and new style names will be gossipped back to it and
you'll still
On May 2, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Jon Meredith wrote:
> Hi Nitish, for this to work you'll have to stop all the nodes at the same
> time, clear the ring on all nodes, start up all nodes, then rejoin
>
> If you clear the rings one node at a time, when you rejoin the nodes the ring
> with the old and
