Hi,
Does anyone know how to switch from Bitcask to eLevelDB?
In app.config both of them exist as shown below:
%% Bitcask Config
{bitcask, [
{data_root, "./data/bitcask"}
]},
%% eLevelDB Config
{eleveldb, [
{data_root, "./data/leveldb"}
]},
Rega
Hi Alek,
You need to change the setting under Riak KV Config, it should be about Line 40
- 45 in your app.config. Just change it to reflect what you have below and then
restart Riak.
%% Riak KV config
{riak_kv, [
%% Storage_backend specifies the Erlang module defining the storage
Hi Alek,
Sorry, I made a mistake earlier.
Below is the correct information.
%% Riak KV config
{riak_kv, [
%% Storage_backend specifies the Erlang module defining the storage
%% mechanism that will be used on this node.
{storage_backend, riak_kv_eleveldb_backend},
I am trying to execute multi get of list of keys in java pb client. My
map-reduce query looks as following (found from debugging):
{"inputs":{"bucket":"mybucket","key_filters":[["eq","keypart1@
@@keypart2"]]},"query":[{"map":{"language":"javascript","name":"Riak.mapValuesJson","keep":true}}]}
Th
Hey guys,
I currently have an app that uses the RiakClient/RiakObject interface
(fetch(),store(),etc) in lieu of the
IRiakClient/IRiakObject/FetchObject interface.
Is there any way for me to continue using my code with
PBClusterConfig? It looks like I need to move to using IRiakClient in
order t
Ahmed,
I think you'll find this resource useful, it contains some examples of how
to use PBClusterConfig:
https://github.com/basho/riak-java-client/wiki/ClientFactory
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ahmed Bashir wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I currently have an app that uses the RiakClient/RiakObject
Thanks for the link; this is precisely what led me to believe that
PBClusterConfig only supports IRiakClient, so I thought I'd ask around
...
Also, if we create a RiakClient with a single host (and others exist),
is there any auto-dicovery that goes on to balance the requests across
ll ring member
Ahmed,
Only one host will process the request (although it will be dispatched
automatically as needed to replicas around the cluster). If you must
connect to only a single host, consider putting a load-balancer between
your client and Riak. We are working on auto-configuring clients for a
future R
Hi Ahmed,
On 11 Apr 2012, at 19:45, Ahmed Bashir wrote:
> Thanks for the link; this is precisely what led me to believe that
> PBClusterConfig only supports IRiakClient, so I thought I'd ask around
PBClusterConfig is used to produce a RawClient. IRiakClient is just a wrapper
around RawClient. T
Thanks Russell!
Any benefit to using IRiakClient vs RawClient other than what's
apparent in the API spec?
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Russell Brown wrote:
> Hi Ahmed,
>
> On 11 Apr 2012, at 19:45, Ahmed Bashir wrote:
>
> Thanks for the link; this is precisely what led me to believe that
>
On 11 Apr 2012, at 21:20, Ahmed Bashir wrote:
> Thanks Russell!
>
> Any benefit to using IRiakClient vs RawClient other than what's
> apparent in the API spec?
>
RawClient leaves you to deal with all the trade-offs that are consequences of
using fault-tolerant, distributed databases like Riak
It's not clear why the raw client API can't store() a RiakObject; it
looks like I need to implement IRiakObject myself
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Russell Brown wrote:
>
> On 11 Apr 2012, at 21:20, Ahmed Bashir wrote:
>
>> Thanks Russell!
>>
>> Any benefit to using IRiakClient vs RawClient o
On 11 Apr 2012, at 22:15, Ahmed Bashir wrote:
> It's not clear why the raw client API can't store() a RiakObject; it
> looks like I need to implement IRiakObject myself
It stores IRiakObject. There is an implementation in the library. Or use the
builder. It doesn't store RiakObject as there ar
13 matches
Mail list logo
