Hi Jared,
Sorry for the confusion, the Java client you highlight is the Riak client I
meant to originally refer to, I clumsily dropped in the javascript one for
some reason!
I also think it is something which would both communities with benefits for
persisting and accessing data within Riak.
I t
Dear Riak-Users,
we consider to save a large amount (5000) of binary Data (Images) in
a riak cluster. Each image has a size of 648 KB. We want to store 3
copy's of each image.
In this case i need to store 5000 * 648 KB * 3 = 90.5 TB Data. This
calculation didn't include any overhead for
I am trying to write a record with
Riak supplying the key. According to the information at
http://wiki.basho.com/HTTP-Store-Object.html the following should work:
curl
-X POST -d "foo" -H "Content-Type: text/plain"
http://host:port/buckets/mybk
Hi Carl,
The URL on the Wiki is incorrect. It should be:
http://host:port/buckets/mybkt/keys
I will make sure the Wiki is updated.
Thanks,
Dan
Daniel Reverri
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
d...@basho.com
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Carl wrote:
> I am trying to write a rec
Greg,
Your amazing thanks. In my application its failing on the start of the
application, I do not believe while trying to do a request but its possible
let me grok and get back to you with some trace backs.
As far as Im aware to define more than one hostport with the client you
still have to hack
Do keep in mind that you loose the ability to set an R-value by doing this,
and you are essentially requesting an R-value of 1. Not exactly ideal for
many applications.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:20 AM, wrote:
> If you know the keys you're going to be retrieving, you can pass bucket:key
> combin
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:34, Michael Clemmons wrote:
> Greg,
> Your amazing thanks. In my application its failing on the start of the
> application, I do not believe while trying to do a request but its possible
> let me grok and get back to you with some trace backs.
Sounds good. I just looke
Hey all,
i'm having trouble articulating for colleagues why using vnode_vclock=true
in Riak 1.0 avoids the issues outlined in the Vector Clocks are Hard page.
This is probably a sign that i don't understand it well enough myself.
My understanding is that requests to a vnode are processed in seria
Greg,
You were correct, its doing a lookup on initialization(something I'll have
to deal with next). Here is a traceback(cut off at app code) when a bad
port is used:
File "/home/mike/django/riak-python-client/riak/bucket.py", line 260, in
get
return obj.reload(r)
File "/home/mike/django/r
Hi all,
I realize I'm wy late to this thread, but wanted to confirm. Yes,
Seven Databases in Seven Weeks[1] does indeed have a Riak chapter. It's
the first NoSQL database we discuss actually.
As a matter of experimentation, we show how to create a multi-node setup on
the same machine, but I
I'm using Riak 1.0.2 with the LevelDB Backend.
I was trying to use the Search function e.g. curl
http://localhost:8098/solr/customers/select?q=first_name:john
However, from the online documentation, it says I have to enable indexing
for the bucket i.e. curl -X PUT -H "content-type:application/jso
Charles by default search is disabled. Take a look in your app.config file and
make sure you have set the following:
{riak_search, [
%% To enable Search functionality set this 'true'.
{enabled, true}
]},
--gordon
On Jan 24, 2012, at 19:18 , char
Thanks Gordon,
I did just that and restarted Riak, but I'm still getting 503 errors
(request timed out) when I try to add data.
Not sure what I'm supposed to be doing. I could add data before the
pre-commit hook, not sure what the problem is.
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Nicholas Young
wrote:
> Unless something has changed drastically, only LevelDB supports secondary
> indexes: http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-September/005839.html
> ___
This is true, but
On Jan 24, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Nicholas Young
> wrote:
>> Unless something has changed drastically, only LevelDB supports secondary
>> indexes:
>> http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-September/005839.html
>> __
Correct. Thanks for clarifying, Reid.
Mark
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Reid Draper wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Nicholas Young
>> wrote:
>>> Unless something has changed drastically, only LevelDB supports secondary
>>>
16 matches
Mail list logo
