Hi,
I'm adding a range of keys to a MapReduce object, knowing that some of them do
not exist.
When running map & reduce functions, I've noticed a strange behavior like
adding 'not_found' records to the input of the reduce. Is there a way to simply
ignore un-existing keys?
Thanks,
[cid:image00
On 8 Jan 2012, at 11:03, Yehuda Zargrov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m adding a range of keys to a MapReduce object, knowing that some of them
> do not exist.
> When running map & reduce functions, I’ve noticed a strange behavior like
> adding ‘not_found’ records to the input of the reduce. Is there a
(An earlier post seems not to have gone through. My apologies in the eventual
case of a duplicate.)
I'm thinking of using Riak to replace a large Oracle system, and I'm trying to
understand its guarantees. I have a few introductory questions; this is the
first of three.
I'm trying to understan
(An earlier post seems not to have gone through. My apologies in the eventual
case of a duplicate.)
I'm thinking of using Riak to replace a large Oracle system, and I'm trying to
understand its guarantees. I have a few introductory questions; this is the
second of three.
Imagine I do a write,
(An earlier post seems not to have gone through. My apologies in the eventual
case of a duplicate.)
I'm thinking of using Riak to replace a large Oracle system, and I'm trying to
understand its guarantees. I have a few introductory questions; this is the
third of three.
I would like to do two
