Map Reduce behavior when key not found

2012-01-08 Thread Yehuda Zargrov
Hi, I'm adding a range of keys to a MapReduce object, knowing that some of them do not exist. When running map & reduce functions, I've noticed a strange behavior like adding 'not_found' records to the input of the reduce. Is there a way to simply ignore un-existing keys? Thanks, [cid:image00

Re: Map Reduce behavior when key not found

2012-01-08 Thread Russell Brown
On 8 Jan 2012, at 11:03, Yehuda Zargrov wrote: > Hi, > > I’m adding a range of keys to a MapReduce object, knowing that some of them > do not exist. > When running map & reduce functions, I’ve noticed a strange behavior like > adding ‘not_found’ records to the input of the reduce. Is there a

Newbie question 1/3

2012-01-08 Thread John DeTreville
(An earlier post seems not to have gone through. My apologies in the eventual case of a duplicate.) I'm thinking of using Riak to replace a large Oracle system, and I'm trying to understand its guarantees. I have a few introductory questions; this is the first of three. I'm trying to understan

Newbie question 2/3

2012-01-08 Thread John DeTreville
(An earlier post seems not to have gone through. My apologies in the eventual case of a duplicate.) I'm thinking of using Riak to replace a large Oracle system, and I'm trying to understand its guarantees. I have a few introductory questions; this is the second of three. Imagine I do a write,

Newbie question 3/3

2012-01-08 Thread John DeTreville
(An earlier post seems not to have gone through. My apologies in the eventual case of a duplicate.) I'm thinking of using Riak to replace a large Oracle system, and I'm trying to understand its guarantees. I have a few introductory questions; this is the third of three. I would like to do two