Hi all,
I saw a lot of messages like this in my riak log:
<0.3681.19>@riak_kv_js_manager:blocking_dispatch:246 JS call failed:
All VMs are busy
And Riak seems get slower in response.
Can anyone share how to resolve this?
Thanks,
Walter
___
riak-user
I have a bucket which contains images refernced by a key which is made up
from a guid. I have a number of servers in my cluster and my bucket is set
up to store 3 versions of every item in the bucket across the servers in
the cluster. I'd like to understand a little bit more about how my cluster
is
Hi,
For Riak Mobile, I occasionally need to use a M/R job to scan all key/values in
a bucket and compute a content-hash for each object in a bucket. This works
fine, but ...
I'd like to be able to do a "consistent map/reduce" job i.e., with "R=2
semantics" for an "N=3 bucket". Maybe other pe
Walter,
There are three settings you can adjust in the riak app.config file that
control the number of javascript vms: map_js_vm_count, reduce_js_vm_count, and
hook_js_vm_count. If you are doing a lot of javascript mapreduce and seeing the
error you mentioned, increase the map and reduce vm cou
Evening, Morning, Afternoon to All
For today's Recap: new code, contributions to the Python client, and more.
Enjoy.
Mark
Community Manager
Basho Technologies
wiki.basho.com
twitter.com/pharkmillups
---
Riak Recap for November 18 - 20
1
The 2i features are certainly more convenient than building secondary
indexes manually, which is the only alternative until now. I'm a little
concerned about the performance of the coverage queries as our cluster
grows. Building a secondary index manually does scale very nicely as new
nodes are a
> Have you tried Secondary Indexes?
> Does the feature help solve your problems? If not, why not? Any concerns?
> What is your wish list for the future of Secondary Indexes?
>
yup. I think secondary indexes is probably one of the most-wanted
options for this release. It does impact how you are abl
