4 step.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the information and help so far!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 08.08.2012, at 19:57, Jon Meredith wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Only test coverage. We didn&#
lerance - we didn't make any file format
>>>>>>> changes to bitcask so your data should be safe. If you wanted to try
>>>>>>> it, I would take a backup of the ring directory in case you had to
>>>>>>> downgrade t
e again for any reason.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the newly upgraded node you could run riak_core_capability:all(). on
>>>>>> the riak console, that would double-check that the settings matched the
>>>>>> required rolling upgrade
.08.2012, at 19:38, Jon Meredith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would recommend going 0.14.2 -> 1.1.4 -> 1.2, making sure you follow
>>>>> the pre-1.0 upgrade instructions on
>>>>> http://wiki.basho.com/Rolling-Upgrades.html
>>>>>
>>&
ons on http://wiki.basho.com/Rolling-Upgrades.html
>>>>
>>>> Once you do the upgrade from 1.2, the capabilities system will kick in and
>>>> the old legacy settings mentioned in the rolling upgrade will no longer be
>>>> used (if you
an override them with the new capability override
>>> mechanism).
>>>
>>> Jon.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Nathan Wilken wrote:
>>> Is an intermediate upgrade recommended? 0.14.2 --> 1.0/1.1 --> 1.2?
>>>
>>
M, Nathan Wilken wrote:
> > Is an intermediate upgrade recommended? 0.14.2 --> 1.0/1.1 --> 1.2?
> >
> >
> >
> > From: riak-users-boun...@lists.basho.com
> > [riak-users-boun...@lists.basho.com] on behalf of Sean Cribbs
> > [s...@basho.com]
> > Sent:
[
> s...@basho.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 6:35 AM
> > To: Sebastian Cohnen
> > Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > Subject: Re: Upgrading 0.14.2 cluster to 1.2
> >
> > Sebastian,
> >
> > While it might work, we did not specifically test upgra
8, 2012 6:35 AM
> To: Sebastian Cohnen
> Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
> Subject: Re: Upgrading 0.14.2 cluster to 1.2
>
> Sebastian,
>
> While it might work, we did not specifically test upgrades from 0.14.2, only
> 1.0 and 1.1.
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:08 A
-
> *From:* riak-users-boun...@lists.basho.com [
> riak-users-boun...@lists.basho.com] on behalf of Sean Cribbs [
> s...@basho.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 08, 2012 6:35 AM
> *To:* Sebastian Cohnen
> *Cc:* riak-users@lists.basho.com
> *Subject:* Re: Upgrading 0.14.2 cluster to 1.2
: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Upgrading 0.14.2 cluster to 1.2
Sebastian,
While it might work, we did not specifically test upgrades from 0.14.2, only
1.0 and 1.1.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Sebastian Cohnen
mailto:sebastian.coh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hey list,
is it a
Sebastian,
While it might work, we did not specifically test upgrades from 0.14.2,
only 1.0 and 1.1.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> is it a good idea to upgrade a small (3 node) cluster straight to 1.2 from
> 0.14.2. Especially with riak's 1.2 capabiliti
Hey list,
is it a good idea to upgrade a small (3 node) cluster straight to 1.2 from
0.14.2. Especially with riak's 1.2 capabilities negotiation, it feels like the
upgrade process should be much simpler now? We don't do any M/R jobs currently
and we are only using bitcask right now.
Best
Seb
13 matches
Mail list logo
