>
> I use native API myself. But is the difference between Protocol Buffers
> format and Erlang's External Term format so huge that you can see it in real
> world applications? I hardly believe so.
The primary difference is that you don't need all of the extra node/process
discovery stuff tha
27.08.2010 14:00, Dmitry Vasiliev пишет:
27.08.2010 13:29, russell.brown пишет:
Have a look at http://gist.github.com/404645 from Cliif Moon for
starting Riak for tests.
Thank you! That looks exactly what I want.
Ugh, it seems the recipe is little bit outdated. In my test setup Riak
require
27.08.2010 13:29, russell.brown пишет:
Have a look at http://gist.github.com/404645 from Cliif Moon for
starting Riak for tests.
Thank you! That looks exactly what I want.
--
Dmitry Vasiliev
http://hlabs.org
http://twitter.com/hdima
___
riak-users
27.08.2010 12:52, Dmitry Demeshchuk пишет:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Dmitry Vasiliev wrote:
Hi all,
I'm start to use Riak in one of my Erlang based projects and looking for a
ways to automatic test my application with Riak. Is there an easy way to
start/stop some lightweight Riak insta
Have a look at http://gist.github.com/404645 from Cliif Moon for starting Riak for tests.CheersRussellOn 27 Aug, 2010,at 09:47 AM, Dmitry Vasiliev wrote:Hi all,
I'm start to use Riak in one of my Erlang based projects and looking for
a ways to automatic test my application with Riak. Is there an
There are 2 Riak API's for Erlang: native and protobuffs.
Protocol Buffers API is better if you're going to connect to remote
nodes as its data format is very compact.
Native API is a bit more convenient for me so I prefer it if not
working with remote nodes.
As for tests, you can pre-create a ET
Hi all,
I'm start to use Riak in one of my Erlang based projects and looking for
a ways to automatic test my application with Riak. Is there an easy way
to start/stop some lightweight Riak instance (for example with ets
backend) in tests or I need to emulate Riak's client API myself?
--
Dmit
