Re: Status and maturity of riak-cs

2017-08-01 Thread Russell Brown
Not sure how great an idea is it to inject an unfinished solution into the conversation, but Scott Fritchie and a small team were working on Machi, before it was short-sightedly shelved by management. https://github.com/basho/machi Maybe the world could use another blob store after all? On 1

RE: Status and maturity of riak-cs

2017-08-01 Thread Javier Palacios
> -Mensaje original- > De: riak-users [mailto:riak-users-boun...@lists.basho.com] En nombre de > Toby Corkindale > > I've been actively trying to migrate over to Minio for S3 storage, instead. > Worth a look, and unlike riak CS, has had lots of active development in recent > times. Regar

Re: Status and maturity of riak-cs

2017-07-31 Thread Toby Corkindale
Riak CS works, but has some long-standing issues that have never been resolved. It doesn't support AWSv4 auth signatures, so some client libraries won't talk to it at all. It's quite fragile in respect to its connections to Riak KV -- if KV is slow to start up, then Riak CS dies. If KV is restarted

Re: Status and maturity of riak-cs

2017-07-20 Thread Stefan Funk
Thanks again Russell and Steve for your input. I answered you before without adding the group. We found LeoFS, Ceph and Minio Server to be interesting alternatives - but haven't tested them. Furthermore there is Pithos, FakeS3, Eucalyptus, Scality . And there is Swift. On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 8

Re: Status and maturity of riak-cs

2017-07-19 Thread Alex De la rosa
I never had the time to implement CS but my idea was using it as a photo/video storage for the social network I was building on Raik-KV. But seeing Basho's situation is better to look for a CS alternative. LeoFS looks good, and seems Rakuten is one of its sponsors... might well test it. Thanks, A

Re: Status and maturity of riak-cs

2017-07-19 Thread Russell Brown
I was really only thinking of LeoFS, Ceph, and Joyent Manta. There must be others. Or stay on CS. What do you need to stay on it? Basho were certainly not doing anything. On 20 Jul 2017, at 06:57, Alex De la rosa wrote: > "However there are alternatives under active development."... can you p

Re: Status and maturity of riak-cs

2017-07-19 Thread Alex De la rosa
"However there are alternatives under active development."... can you please list them? I'm also interested on a CS alternative. Thanks, Alex On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Russell Brown wrote: > Hi Stefan > On the one hand, even before the demise of Basho, they’d stopped > supporting Riak CS

Re: Status and maturity of riak-cs

2017-07-19 Thread Russell Brown
Hi Stefan On the one hand, even before the demise of Basho, they’d stopped supporting Riak CS. On the other, there is an organisation based in Japan, but with an international remote team, that supports other CS customers, so may well be a choice of support. The CS code base has not had a huge

Status and maturity of riak-cs

2017-07-19 Thread Stefan Funk
Hi everybody, I'm new to Riak-CS and just joined the group. We've been exploring Riak-CS now for a couple of days and consider it as a potential inhouse-alternative to external S3-based storage providers. Given the last commit was in January 2016, the question rose as to how well the project is