Thanks to all. I'll take that option. Will let you guys know if I get any
strange behavior.
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 4:50 PM, Christopher Meiklejohn
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Feb 19, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Daniel Iwan wrote:
>>
>> My ideas:
>> 1. Rewrite (read-write) object with new va
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Daniel Iwan wrote:
>
> My ideas:
> 1. Rewrite (read-write) object with new values for all indexes
> 2. Enable siblings on a bucket, write empty object with update for your
> index, that will create sibling.
> Then whenever you read object do merge of object+indexes
to "save" bandwidth
Option 1 is definitely simpler though.
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Secondary-index-in-riak-tp4032650p4032652.html
Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 9:06 AM, Jose G. Quenum
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I'm getting into a scenario where I'd like to use a secondary index on a
> particular field in my riak object/data. However the value of the field might
> change albeit very very rarely. So I was thinking I could just reinde
Hi all,
I'm getting into a scenario where I'd like to use a secondary index on a
particular field in my riak object/data. However the value of the field might
change albeit very very rarely. So I was thinking I could just reindex using
the new value. What's the right syntax to delete and add a n
