On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Sajithkumar Kizhakkiniyil
wrote:
> If my understanding is correct a reduce phase with
> riak_kv_mapreduce.reduce_identity is needed for secondary index query.
Hi, Sajithkumar. The reduce_identity function is only needed if the
result you want is the list of bucke
@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Secondary Index Map and reduce order and performance
Do you get the *same* results in both cases?
-Alexander Sicular
@siculars
http://siculars.posterous.com
On Nov 30, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Sajithkumar Kizhakkiniyil wrote:
Hello
Probably my understanding of M/R might be wrong. But
Do you get the *same* results in both cases?
-Alexander Sicular
@siculars
http://siculars.posterous.com
On Nov 30, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Sajithkumar Kizhakkiniyil wrote:
> Hello
> Probably my understanding of M/R might be wrong. But I am getting drastic
> performance difference when running second
Do you get the results in both cases?
-Alexander Sicular
@siculars
http://siculars.posterous.com
On Nov 30, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Sajithkumar Kizhakkiniyil wrote:
> Hello
> Probably my understanding of M/R might be wrong. But I am getting drastic
> performance difference when running secondary ind
Hello
Probably my understanding of M/R might be wrong. But I am getting drastic
performance difference when running secondary index query on PB with map and
reduce function in different order.
If my understanding is correct a reduce phase with
riak_kv_mapreduce.reduce_identity is needed for seco
