Date: 11/16/2013 8:15 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Russell Brown
Cc: riak-users ,Eric Redmond
Subject: Re: Riak as backend for Titian graph DB
Thank you Eric and Russell,
I forwarded your replies to Matthias. Unfortunately it doesn't sound too
encouraging, but I hope you will get around to lo
Thank you Eric and Russell,
I forwarded your replies to Matthias. Unfortunately it doesn't sound too
encouraging, but I hope you will get around to looking into Titan
integration.
Best regards,
Bernie
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Russell Brown wrote:
> To add what Eric said: I don’t know
To add what Eric said: I don’t know Titan, but the phrase “atomic edge
operations” suggests they require properties from the datastore that Riak’s
eventually consistent datatypes can’t satisfy.
All that said, we have been asked by a customer to look at integration with
Titan, and when time perm
The new sets aren't sorted, they're just proper sets.
Riak isn't fundamentally changing from a key value store, the values of the new
data types are just convergent. So you still retrieve the whole value at a
time, no partial values (eg. subsets).
Eric
On Nov 15, 2013, at 6:39 PM, bernie wro
Hi,
there was a thread on the Google's Titan group about using Riak with Titan.
Matthias (one of the lead developers) initial response was that Riak's data
model was difficult to work with for their use case.
When I asked him about the new 2.0 data types he answered the following
"Sets seem close
