gt;> 1x100MB chunk from a single server. It's also easier for disks to
> pull a
> >>>>> 1MB object without delaying any other requests than pulling a 100MB
> object,
> >>>>> which may end up queuing other requests made after.
> >>>>>
&g
ng any other requests than pulling a 100MB
>>>>> object,
>>>>> which may end up queuing other requests made after.
>>>>>
>>>>> There used to be a project called luwak that was built into Riak and
>>>>> handled chunking files
;>> handled chunking files like this, but it has been EOL'd. Perhaps someone
>>>>> can shed some light on this. Is RiakCS the final solution for binary
>>>>> storage? Or is there another way to store larger objects in Riak?
>>>>>
>&g
gt; There used to be a project called luwak that was built into Riak and
>>>> handled chunking files like this, but it has been EOL'd. Perhaps someone
>>>> can shed some light on this. Is RiakCS the final solution for binary
>>>> storage? Or is there anothe
eed to expose an S3 interface, don't need the S3 permission
>>> structure, and really just want file storage.
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Alex De la rosa"
>>> To: "Hector Castro"
>>> Cc: "riak-
t;
>> RiakCS is wonderful, but it does seem overkill for some uses where you
>> don't need to expose an S3 interface, don't need the S3 permission
>> structure, and really just want file storage.
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Alex De la rosa
it does seem overkill for some uses where you
> don't need to expose an S3 interface, don't need the S3 permission
> structure, and really just want file storage.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alex De la rosa" >
> To: "Hector Castro" >
>
ut it does seem overkill for some uses where you don't
need to expose an S3 interface, don't need the S3 permission structure, and
really just want file storage.
- Original Message -
From: "Alex De la rosa"
To: "Hector Castro"
Cc: "riak-users"
Sent:
Hi Hector,
Thanks for your response :) highly appreciated. I have more questions
though.
Riak CS has to be implemented in Amazon S3? Or can I house it myself with
own managed servers?
What is the limit for an object in Standard Riak? Large objects should go
to Riak CS, but what would be a limit
Hey Alex,
My response are inline below.
--
Hector
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Alex De la rosa
wrote:
> Hi Hector,
>
> I see, I always thought that Riak CS was the same as Riak just that you run
> it in Amazon S3... they are actually different...
Correct, but it is important to note that
Hi Hector,
I see, I always thought that Riak CS was the same as Riak just that you run
it in Amazon S3... they are actually different...
So... if I have a social network and one of the features is that they can
share video, I would use a normal Riak cluster for the webapp and data and
a Riak CS c
Hi Alex,
For this type of problem, you may want to look into Riak CS. [0] It is
an object storage platform built on top of Riak.
When you GET an object from Riak CS, you can specify a Range header to
get the object by its byte offset. [1]
--
Hector
[0] http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/
[1]
12 matches
Mail list logo
