HI Mattew,
Thank you for the help.
I got answer from Shaun already, seems LevelDB and Bitcask, they are same,
memory usage does not show up in Erlang.
Br,
Alex
2017-01-26 14:47 GMT+01:00 Matthew Von-Maszewski :
> Alex,
>
> Which backend are you using? Leveldb's memory usage does not show up
>
Alex,
Which backend are you using? Leveldb's memory usage does not show up within
Erlang. Maybe that is what you are experiencing?
Matthew
Sent from my iPad
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 5:47 AM, Alex Feng wrote:
>
> Hi Riak Users,
>
> One of my riak nodes, it has 4G memory, when I check the memo
Hello Edgar,
The consistent handoff behavior is normally indicative of a network issue
which is resulting in frequent fallback vnodes starts. Based on your
previous messages, you are handing off quite a few vnodes with 1 object so
the vnodes are not long lived. Additionally, the most recent errors
Hi again everyone!
- The memory usage keeps growing day by day:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1962284/riak2.png
- The handoffs keep on going, with strange things like a transfer started
1.5 days ago:
riak-admin transfers
'riak@192.168.20.112' waiting to handoff 51 partitions
'riak@192.168.2
Hi,
I can't speak to when this issue will be resolved, but it is known.
Please watch the following issues on GitHub:
https://github.com/basho/webmachine/issues/183
https://github.com/basho/riak/issues/603
--
Luke Bakken
Engineer / CSE
lbak...@basho.com
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:05 AM, riakuser0
This issue was related to
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/HTTP-Access-Log-Performance-Log-issues-td4031830.html#a4031849.
Basically, when HTTP logging was enabled, memory usage started to gradually
increase until the Riak cluster ran out of memory.
It looks like after Riak attempts to roll
I have the following properties set in my buckets:
{
props: {
allow_mult: false,
basic_quorum: false,
big_vclock: 1,
chash_keyfun: {
mod: "riak_core_util",
fun: "chash_std_keyfun"
},
dw: "quorum",
last_write_wins: true,
linkfun: {
Look into vector clock growth and siblings. You may have siblings to true.
@siculars
http://siculars.posthaven.com
Sent from my iRotaryPhone
> On Sep 25, 2014, at 03:54, riakuser01 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am currently using an in-memory backend on Riak 1.4.8, and I am
> experiencing a situatio
I'm not sure. I think it would depend on the number of JavaScript MR engines
you have running, the operations you're performing, and the amount of data that
is being read into memory.
--
Jeremiah Peschka
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
MCITP: Database Developer, DBA
On Tuesday, February 15, 2011 at 5:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 04:44:58PM -0800, Jeremiah Peschka wrote:
> You'll be constrained in the number of keys that you can store (using the
> bitcask backend). There's a good spreadsheet for capacity planning:
> https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Ak4OBkABJPsxdEowYXc2akxnYU9xNkJmbmZscnhaTF
You'll be constrained in the number of keys that you can store (using the
bitcask backend). There's a good spreadsheet for capacity planning:
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Ak4OBkABJPsxdEowYXc2akxnYU9xNkJmbmZscnhaTFE&hl=en&authkey=CMHw8tYO
I don't know how well Riak would behave otherw
11 matches
Mail list logo
