Hi Justin,
Thanks for the feedback. Just thought I'd mention we're aiming to go
ahead with a strategy of serialising the transactions before they hit
Riak. We figure it'll be easier to solve than trying to do conflict
resolution.
Cheers,
--Misha
On 14 July 2010 14:00, Justin Sheehy wrote:
> On
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Misha Gorodnitzky wrote:
> I don't suppose there are any examples anywhere of how people have
> approached conflict resolution with RIak? That would be useful to help
> people understand how to approach it ... maybe a section on the wiki
> could be dedicated to it
Hi Justin,
On 13 July 2010 18:20, Justin Sheehy wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Misha Gorodnitzky wrote:
>
>> From doing a little testing, the last value in a multipart document is
>> the first, so "Thursday" in this case, can we assume that this will
>> always be the case? And is it
I doubt it. Nothing in riak is guaranteed to be ordered, afaik. Best bet is
when using allow_mult=true, enabling siblings in buckets, is to order the multi
response by last modified date in your application.
On Jul 13, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Misha Gorodnitzky wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We're trying t
Hello, Misha.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Misha Gorodnitzky wrote:
> From doing a little testing, the last value in a multipart document is
> the first, so "Thursday" in this case, can we assume that this will
> always be the case? And is it a good idea to base conflict resolution
> on this
